Loans | Loans | Cheap Loan | Video game rental | Mortgage Calculator
Rollie and Omega [Archive] - Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum

PDA

View Full Version : Rollie and Omega


Arturo
14 December 2006, 05:32 PM
Do any of you like to change back and forth between your Omegas and your Rollies? I have a Seamaster and I really like it. It does not have the ultimate "gravitas" of the Rolex, but it is definitely nice and I find the two to be kindred watch spirits. What do you think?

DIVER4USN
14 December 2006, 05:39 PM
I think that is one hell of an idea. I am trying to talk my wife into a SMP share wrist time with my SD.

Uncle-AJ
14 December 2006, 05:41 PM
I used to swap between my TT sub and classic seamaster but I haven't worn the Omega in quite a while. I'll never get rid of it as I bought it new around about 1974 and it was my first classic watch. I used to swap between a Panerai and the TT sub until last February when I decided the sub was a much better watch and had more charisma. Whatever I swap with, I always return to the sub. :cheers:

DIVER4USN
14 December 2006, 05:42 PM
Adrian,

Can you post a pic of your vintage Seamaster?

Uncle-AJ
14 December 2006, 05:47 PM
Sorry I got carried away for a minute, it's a speedy. :banghead: :banghead:

You'll have to put it down to my age. :chuckle:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y204/ajdh/speedM.jpg

roadcarver
15 December 2006, 01:41 AM
Once I open up my present which has the Omega SMP, it will definitely be sharing wrist time with the Breitling, Rolex and Steinhart.

I love the feel of the Omega bracelet as it is very comfy.

Atomic
15 December 2006, 01:48 AM
I swap between my Panerai PAM01 and my Seiko Black Monster, and my Rolex ExpII sits in teh box, gathering dust.

mikey
15 December 2006, 03:19 AM
I think the Pani is the type of watch you just cannot put in a box and forget about. Its outrageous

JJ Irani
15 December 2006, 03:22 AM
I think the Pani is the type of watch you just cannot put in a box and forget about. Its outrageous

Not quite fair, Mikey. While some of us may not find Panerais appealing, it still is a great watch with tremendous History.

Some of their models like the Submersible and the GMT are truly superb, especially on their classical SS/Ti bracelets.

Only brand you are allowed to smash around is RADO!! :banghead: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

Atomic
15 December 2006, 04:22 AM
I think the Pani is the type of watch you just cannot put in a box and forget about. Its outrageous

Mikey, you're 100% bang on. My Panerai gets 99% of the wrist time. :thumbsup:

Arturo
15 December 2006, 09:48 AM
I agree that the Omega SMP bracelet is a great work of engineering. I love how solid it is. It seems less subject to bracelet laxity over time than the oyster bracelet.

mike
15 December 2006, 10:02 AM
I think they go quite well together.:thumbsup:
Especially when each has a lot of history!!:clap: :clap:
http://img275.imageshack.us/img275/5229/145456650wh2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

mrbieler
15 December 2006, 10:06 AM
I just can't get into the Panerai's. I know they are very very good watches and the ones I have seen look great, but I just can't see one on my wrist.

An Omega Speedy would be nice though...

Prince Tudor
15 December 2006, 12:59 PM
I think Pan.'s are nice. They have a style that really is unique.
But, the Speedy's and Sub's will always be in style. They are classics.

Atomic
15 December 2006, 01:06 PM
I think Pan.'s are nice. They have a style that really is unique.
But, the Speedy's and Sub's will always be in style. They are classics.

Just for the record, the Panerai Radiomir has remained basically unchanged since 1938, and the Luminor since the early 1940s. They too are classics that will always be in style. :cheers:

DIVER4USN
15 December 2006, 03:29 PM
Adrian,


Thanks for posting the pic. Great watch; which I will refer to as "timeless" as to avoid the age thing.

Uncle-AJ
15 December 2006, 03:37 PM
Adrian,


Thanks for posting the pic. Great watch; which I will refer to as "timeless" as to avoid the age thing.

I'm afraid I was thinking something different than I was typing. :banghead: :banghead:

DIVER4USN
15 December 2006, 03:41 PM
Adrian,

I now realize you were talking about your misprint in the previous post. Should make you feel good about your age. I am 31 and overlooked the obvious!

AJC
15 December 2006, 09:59 PM
This is a frequent thread in my watch collecting profile.Omega,Rolex,Omega,Rolex etc etc.

As I don't have a big budget I normally only have the one watch at a time and when it is an Omega it will be a Seamaster.

Ist Omega I owned was an Ian Thorpe LE

http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/4489/3e-thorpe9.jpg
http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/6186/05-thorpebx.jpg

followed by a 2254.50.00

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/3860/Sscn0203.jpg

a co-axial Bond GMT was next,

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/9531/gmte5rs.jpg

and finally my White GMT,

http://img447.imageshack.us/img447/3506/gmtonomegaboxzn3.jpg

Each time between the Omegas Ihave had Rolex Submariners or GMT Masters.I would dearly love to keep some but as I said before I am on a budget.:thumbsup:

Aaron:cheers:

Uncle-AJ
15 December 2006, 10:39 PM
Adrian,

I now realize you were talking about your misprint in the previous post. Should make you feel good about your age. I am 31 and overlooked the obvious!

I'd feel a lot better if I was 31 again. :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

astcell
15 December 2006, 11:29 PM
I don't wanna be 31 again unless I can take my 44 year old brain with me.

Rockrolex
15 December 2006, 11:36 PM
I'm having too much fun at 63 to want to be 31 again. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

astcell
16 December 2006, 01:21 AM
I'm having too much fun at 63 to want to be 31 again. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

So, senility sets in between 44 and 63. :rofl:

TARDIS
16 December 2006, 04:21 PM
This is a frequent thread in my watch collecting profile.Omega,Rolex,Omega,Rolex etc etc.

As I don't have a big budget I normally only have the one watch at a time and when it is an Omega it will be a Seamaster.

Ist Omega I owned was an Ian Thorpe LE

http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/4489/3e-thorpe9.jpg
http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/6186/05-thorpebx.jpg

followed by a 2254.50.00

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/3860/Sscn0203.jpg

a co-axial Bond GMT was next,

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/9531/gmte5rs.jpg

and finally my White GMT,

http://img447.imageshack.us/img447/3506/gmtonomegaboxzn3.jpg

Each time between the Omegas Ihave had Rolex Submariners or GMT Masters.I would dearly love to keep some but as I said before I am on a budget.:thumbsup:

Aaron:cheers:

Hey Aaron I am in the same boat. I would have loved to have kept this:

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f96/Toowoomba/DIAL.jpg

or even this:

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f96/Toowoomba/Dialcloseup1.jpg

buy now I have this one, which is a keeper:

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f96/Toowoomba/Planet%20Ocean/Onclothfaceup.jpg


BTW, I like your Co-Axial Bond GMT, that was a nice model.

Nice photo's as well!:thumbsup:

AJC
16 December 2006, 04:30 PM
Thanks Steve.:thumbsup:

JJ Irani
16 December 2006, 06:56 PM
When I get fed up of this Rollie....

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JJIrani/Sub-date037.jpg

...I'll switch over to this one!! :chuckle: :chuckle:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JJIrani/16613018-1.jpg

mailman
16 December 2006, 08:01 PM
When I get fed up of this Rollie....

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JJIrani/Sub-date037.jpg

...I'll switch over to this one!! :chuckle: :chuckle:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JJIrani/16613018-1.jpg

Nice choices to have JJ :thumbsup:

JJ Irani
17 December 2006, 03:51 AM
Nice choices to have JJ :thumbsup:

Yes indeed, Paulie!! :thumbsup:

Tell me, do I make it that obvious that I love Rolex, especially Subs? :thinking: :thinking: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

mailman
18 December 2006, 01:16 AM
Yes indeed, Paulie!! :thumbsup:

Tell me, do I make it that obvious that I love Rolex, especially Subs? :thinking: :thinking: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Ummm, no :dummy: :banghead: :banghead: :chuckle: