PDA

View Full Version : My Sea Dweller Review


Solar
26 February 2008, 01:25 PM
Hi everyone. This is a review I wrote last year, upon acquiring my Sea Dweller. It was posted by me on another forum, and I see that there is a section here now for Rolex reviews, so I thought I'd post the review and pix here too. Hope you enjoy.

Chris

************************************************** ********


Introduction.

I recently obtained a Sea Dweller (model number 16600). As the name implies and as most of you will know, this is the deep sea diver of the Rolex line. It uses Rolex movement 3135, and is COSC certified. I was looking for a rugged tool watch in this line. I like a date feature in a watch, and found that I did not like the Cyclops. I know many are fans of that feature, but--and this is a personal opinion--I found the Cyclops overwhelmed the crystal and was distracting to me. So, I chose the Sea Dweller; it is rugged, heavily built, meant to last, is beautiful in a low-key fashion and has the features I want in a tool watch.


Overall.


Rolex has been a name most of has have know since we were quite young. I recall the excellent advertisments that Rolex ran in the National Geogprahic magazines of the 1970's, portaying their watches as the quintessential tool for explorers and adventurers far and wide. It was a watch that looked rugged, the first I'd seen with protective shoulders around the crown, indicative of the risks of adventure that the wearer accepted by taking on such an iconic watch. It certainly wasn't the plain flat disc that my father and uncles wore. Since I'm a firm believer that a tool watch is to be used, not locked away, I have been wearing the Sea Dweller at work and at home, and have not been suprised to find it is a beautiful, accurate and rugged timepiece that is a pleasure to use.

Case.



The Oyster case is 40 mm stainless steel, being carved from a single solid block of 904L stainless. There have been discussions as to the purposes of this, most diving watches being made from 316L stainless. What is the point? Rolex warrants that the nickel content is higher, and as such, prevents corrosion.



There is debate as to whether this is necessary or even serves a purpose with normal corrosion levels of metals in seawater at sea level. Be that as it may, the case is 904L stainless. My AD advises that the case of the Sea Dweller and Submariner are the same size, though I saw the post in this forum that reckons that the Sea Dweller case is fractionally smaller than the Sub.

As such, the Sea Dweller is no Panarai. It has a reasonably sized case and dial. The case has brushed and polished aspects, the sides (crown on the 3 'o'clock side and helium escape valve on the 9 'o'clock side) are highly polished.


Movement.

The Sea Dweller uses the Rolex 3135 movement, which is COSC and which in my experience is keeping +/- 3 seconds a day. This is a tried and true movement, also used on the Sub Date models.

Dial.



The dial is black enamel, a deep, bottomless pitch-black with no guilloche or texturing. There is an understated elegance in this dial, the only shine or shimmer I've noticed in the dial itself is in the area around the date at 3 'o'clock, where the dial surface dips to meet the date wheel and the crease in the enamel draws the light and you get a sense of texture. The indices are circular white gold filled with luminescent material.






The hands are also white gold, detailed with luminesence, including the iconic Mercedes-symbol hour hand. The white gold therefore relfects light in a low key but definate manner. When I turn my wrist in the light with this piece, light all but ripples across the indices, reminding me of looking at jewellery displays in museums; subdued, but with presence and bearing.

Bezel.

The bezel is a coin-edge affair which is larger than the Submariner and Submariner Date models. It turns well and firmly with 120 clicks per rotation. I love the slight angle Rolex has on their bezel, combined with the fashion in which the number indices are set into the bezel surface. Each of the indents in the coin edge is sufficiently polished that when facing the bottom of the bezel at the 6 'o'clock, when you rotate your hand left and right, you'll see the ambient light glide along the polished groves of the bezel edge.

Crown.

The Submariners and the Sea Dweller use the Triplock screwdown crown, with O-ring gaskets on the shaft of the crown to prevent water ingress. The crown of course bears the livery of the Rolex Coronet.

Crystal.


This is a 3 mm thick sapphire crystal. I cannot say if there is anti-reflective coating on the underside of the crystal, there certainly is not on the outside. The crystal sits flat and about 2 mm proud of the surface of the bezel. As an authentication, Rolex laser-engraves a coronet symbol around the 6 'o'clock on the crystal.

Bracelet.

The Sea Dweller has the 93160 bracelet, as compared to the 93250 found on the Submariner. My AD held up both the Sea Dweller and the Sub for me to look at, and I could see the Sea Dweller had the thicker, beefier links and more substantial point of connection to the case. Interestingly on my watch, the case horns (exterior) do not have holes or screws evident. As concerns the clasp, I have read complaints about the cheapness of the clasp in a watch at this price point, and I must agree that I'd rather see something like the twin-bar clasp on the Omega SMP or Speed Pro lines. There is a wetsuit extention on this bracelet, with a raised "O" on the metal to indicate the presspoint to actuate the extention release. The extention is returned to its original position by clasping it to a substantial steel pivot bar in the clasp mechanism. The exterior of the clasp bears the Rolex Coronet, and interior clasp has the the word "Rolex" and a stylised scrolling design.

Presentation Box.

A substantial affair, which has an outer paper holder with no ends. The main box slides out of this, to reveal a light green hard paper box with the Rolex Coronet. This opens to reveal the inner soft leatherette box with green top and a three-dimensional ocean wave motif. Inside, your packaged Sea Dweller has a protective foam covering, and clear thick protective plastic that peels from the sides, face and back. There is also plastic protective wrap on the clasp elements. The green adhesive holographic brand stuck the caseback eventually wears off to reveal the only engraving on stock Rolex diving watch casebacks: "ROLEX OYSTER Original Gas Escape Valve" and two Rolex Coronets, the engraving is backfilled in black. I would like to see some sort of sea creature or medallion on the back to give it more character, but no dice. The case is, of course, screw down. The box also contains a manual for the Submariner, for "Your Rolex Oyster", a hard paper 2006/2007 wallet calendar with classic Rolex green and Coronet, a soft green wallet-like affair with a Rolex knurled-metal watch tool (Rolex ref.2100), additional wetsuit extention link, and dive table card. Rolex no longer includes the little key-chain anchor that used to accompany the Sea Dweller.

Conclusion.



This is a substantial watch, heavy at 147 grams, making it the heaviest stock Oyster Professional (beating the Yacht Master by 1 gram) if I'm not mistaken. It has polish and presence, but is not overly flashy. Since this is one of the most copied watches on the planet, people will not remark on it right away they way they might when they see a much larger-cased watch. Since I wear this watch for myself, and not to be noticed, this is just fine.

I wanted the most rugged, "been-there-done-that" Rolex I could afford, and the Sea Dweller is rich in history and performance. For my liking, it is also less common than the Submariner, and even its name, Sea Dweller, seems to imply that this watch would be quite content lurking in the depths for extended periods of time. Since I do not dive commercially, I will likely not use the helium escape valve feature.

I find it comfortable, but it wears a bit heavy and you do not often forget you're wearing it. If you're interested inthis watch, I'd strongly suggest a visit to an AD to try it and the Subs on. The Subs wear lighter, but they have the Cyclope or, in the case of the 14060M Submariner Professional, there is no date and the movement is not COSC, though I'm told its as accurate as COSC, so, all a matter of choice.

I hope you've enjoyed, the opinions, errors and ommissions are purely my own.

Tombstone
26 February 2008, 01:57 PM
Great review, I like the photographs as well. The SD is the all time "TANK" Rolex. You just can not beat the SD for a die hard every day use watch.

Letsgodiving
26 February 2008, 02:58 PM
Great job! Excellent review.

tandrup
26 February 2008, 03:32 PM
Good review - thanks for sharing.

DSJ
27 February 2008, 02:20 AM
Thanks!

JJ Irani
27 February 2008, 02:59 AM
Excellent review, nice pics!! :thumbsup:

kcmo
27 February 2008, 03:10 AM
Great review!

Texsubmariner
27 February 2008, 06:01 AM
Great review for a great watch.

Subdialler
27 February 2008, 07:28 AM
Love the review, fantastic. I'll never be without mine!

Perdu
27 February 2008, 07:43 AM
Thanks for the review. Love the watch.

SPACE-DWELLER
27 February 2008, 08:36 AM
Chris, this is one of the BEST reviews I have EVER read! Really well-written and detailed!

Thanks for sharing!

Robb
27 February 2008, 08:37 AM
Great review!!!! I enjoyed it!

mdtddd2007
27 February 2008, 01:51 PM
Great review!

sea-dweller
28 February 2008, 01:53 PM
Great review & photos !

Cephas
3 March 2008, 02:10 PM
Great review and cool pictures. I especially liked how you can see the second hand movement as an arc in the lume shots. Exposure about 20 sec? Bravo!

sharif
4 March 2008, 01:55 PM
Thank you sharing your well written review of the SD. This timepiece is definatey on my future "buy" list. Thanks again for sharing.

mickeydainish
8 March 2008, 01:11 PM
Wow.... gr8 review. I like the style you wrote it in. Great watch and some food for thought..... :-)

Terry Newton
8 March 2008, 03:15 PM
Excellent review. I almost bought this watch but went with an SS Date Submariner.

Your pictures are excellent. It looks like some a done in water. Yes?

You have me convinced it's an awesome watch.

Terry Newton

timackerman
8 March 2008, 05:25 PM
Great review.

Thanks

erwin
1 April 2008, 03:15 PM
Now, I am overwhelmed and proud to own one!

Tony-GB
22 May 2008, 07:47 AM
What an amazing review. Extremely concise & the photos are superb. The fourth pic of the SD silhouette gave me goosebumps!

Thanks for posting :cheers:

jbomb42
27 May 2008, 12:27 PM
hi guys! just want to ask (im super new here) im planning to buy a watch, but im only looking at spending atmost $7000. any sugestions guys.

in addition, this will be my first ever watch purchase... im 24yrs old and i want to spend for myself for the first watch... and i think watches/timepieces collecting is a nice invest/hobby.


thanks in advance

Brian R Campbell
19 June 2008, 08:09 AM
Excellent review. Your AD, however, is correct in stating that the SD and the Sub share the same case diameter size. One thing to consider is that the SD appears slightly smaller to the eye due to the fact that the dial is slightly smaller to accomodate a correspondingly thicker bezel. This is evidently noticeable when the two watches are compared next to each other.

oztimelord
21 June 2008, 08:25 PM
Great review, agree 100%:thumbsup::thumbsup:

Just got an F series two weeks ago and love it :clap: (the last one with the anchor) :smokin:. This is my first move back to Rolex and what a great way to re-start the collection.

Regards
Rene

Narwhal
22 June 2008, 06:27 AM
Wow - great review - now I gotta figure out what to sell to get a SD! :banghead:

Solar
15 July 2008, 01:38 AM
Excellent review. I almost bought this watch but went with an SS Date Submariner.

Your pictures are excellent. It looks like some a done in water. Yes?

You have me convinced it's an awesome watch.

Terry Newton

Nope, I placed the watch on a piece of semi-opaque Plexiglas and shone light through from the bottom up towards the camera.

Thanks for the kind comments,

Chris

bolex!
15 July 2008, 09:04 PM
hi guys! just want to ask (im super new here) im planning to buy a watch, but im only looking at spending atmost $7000. any sugestions guys.

in addition, this will be my first ever watch purchase... im 24yrs old and i want to spend for myself for the first watch... and i think watches/timepieces collecting is a nice invest/hobby.


thanks in advance
get a last of the series seadweller they are bomb proof and will be a great investment especially as they are due to be discontinued!

gbo83
17 July 2008, 01:53 PM
do u guys think that the discontinued sd will be a collector's someday? prices ranging to 10k+? my friend is interested in buying one for this reason

Solar
20 July 2008, 11:58 PM
Hard to say. However, it is being discontinued in favour of "the new measure", so they will likely become more collectable than less.

boyet
21 July 2008, 01:40 AM
I acquired mine pre owned, D serial. But amazingly there is the absence of " ROLEX OYSTER Original Gas Escape Valve" engraving on the caseback :crying::crying:. Is there somebody out there with the same case as mine. I bought my SD from a friend. I already sought advise from an authorized dealer and was told that there were units that came out without the engraving. Is this true?:thinking:

kenken
21 July 2008, 09:56 PM
amazing review..:thumbsup:

Brcmpbl
23 July 2008, 12:07 AM
I acquired mine pre owned, D serial. But amazingly there is the absence of " ROLEX OYSTER Original Gas Escape Valve" engraving on the caseback :crying::crying:. Is there somebody out there with the same case as mine. I bought my SD from a friend. I already sought advise from an authorized dealer and was told that there were units that came out without the engraving. Is this true?:thinking:


No dice. All SDs are engraved.

Solar
23 July 2008, 06:50 AM
No dice. All SDs are engraved.

Agreed. According to the Rolex Report, even the early models had it.

By the Brcmpbl, nice avatar!

Best,

Chris

hooked
25 July 2008, 05:26 AM
Awesome review!

Parachrom
25 July 2008, 11:25 AM
I am now on my second Sea Dweller. My first was bought in 1974 paid 510 for it. had the small HEV. 23 years later the band broke and I lost it. Insurance bought me a new one in 1992. it had the heavier links and solid end pieces. Still have it 18 years later. The Rolex is ten feet tall and bullet proof. All except the bracelet. Within 3 weeks of getting it, The bracelet separated from the end piece. someone used a hollow cheap tube to hold it together. I would think it would be better made. I had the bracelt cross drilled and pinned with a stainless pin. Been solid ever since, except now the other side is gone. Sigh!!:dummy:

SeaRolex
26 July 2008, 11:21 PM
Do u think the price will shot up after the watch is discontinue? if yes, why? if no, why? pls advise.. i'm thinking of getting one but the price has already shot up high currently.:crying:

wean_sg
27 July 2008, 12:49 AM
Superb review and lume shots! :thumbsup:

CKay
27 July 2008, 02:10 AM
Hi,

Just bought a Sea Dweller last week at S$8751. This is my first Rollie. A steep price, but definitely worth it. Love its classic and timeless look. Thought long and hard about whether to get SD or Sub, but chose SD for its clean look without the cyclops and more rugged feel.

My other watches:
IWC Flieger Chronograph
Omega Speedmaster Chrono Triple Date w Black/Blue Sub-Dial
Omega Speedmaster Chrono Triple Date w black dial
Omega Dynamic Chrono
Oris Carlos Coste 2000m Limited Edition
Players Automatic Watch (1950s)
Seiko Scuba Divers 200m Auto (Made in Japan)
Seiko Scuba Divers 200m Kinetic

SaturnV
2 August 2008, 11:27 AM
[QUOTE=CKay;684800]Hi,

Just bought a Sea Dweller last week at S$8751. This is my first Rollie. A steep price, but definitely worth it. Love its classic and timeless look. Thought long and hard about whether to get SD or Sub, but chose SD for its clean look without the cyclops and more rugged feel.

X2!

SV

elgatonegro
2 August 2008, 05:20 PM
Nice review and picts. :thumbsup:

SaturnV
11 August 2008, 01:16 AM
and now i cant find one (SD classic) at the ad in my area..

Parachrom
22 August 2008, 09:37 AM
This review provides info I never knew. My fist sea dweller bought in 1976, my second in 1992. Both good purchases

Solar
23 August 2008, 12:34 PM
Well, as I say, its not for everyone, but now its no more. The new Deep Sea is going to be quite a sensation, but not everyone likes the Deep Sea, so there you go.

Pity Rolex couldn't have had both the Sea Dweller and the Deep Sea.

Oh well.

Chris

creyneke
25 September 2008, 06:53 PM
I recently bought a SD and I have noticed that mine does not have the laser engraving in the crystal. I bought the watch from an AD and I have all the necessary papaerwork, box, tool, etc. Has Rolex stopped the engraving?

ssshibumi
6 October 2008, 10:34 AM
Hello, I will be travelling to Switzerland next week and am interested in purchasing a SD there. Does anyone know of any advantages or disadvantages to purchasing in Switzerland, for example price? Also, are there any recommendations on where to shop? Great forum. Thanks for your help.

SaturnV
26 October 2008, 09:53 PM
i hear expensive

Hello, I will be travelling to Switzerland next week and am interested in purchasing a SD there. Does anyone know of any advantages or disadvantages to purchasing in Switzerland, for example price? Also, are there any recommendations on where to shop? Great forum. Thanks for your help.

gone-rolex-mad
27 October 2008, 11:53 PM
nice review

messier
28 November 2008, 09:06 PM
I want the same,nice rewiew

superformance
10 December 2008, 08:01 PM
Wow - great review - now I gotta figure out what to sell to get a SD! :banghead:

Sold my 16623 "U' last week in Manila....Hunt is now on for an SD !!!! Thought long and hard to replace my midsize YM with an SD for collectability issue, obviously the money I got from the sale is not enough to buy me a bnew SD "M"-series..

Did I make the right decision??

bradg
22 December 2008, 12:02 PM
Very informative...makes me want one

Solar
30 December 2008, 03:27 AM
I recently bought a SD and I have noticed that mine does not have the laser engraving in the crystal. I bought the watch from an AD and I have all the necessary papaerwork, box, tool, etc. Has Rolex stopped the engraving?

The engraving is there, the trick is using the right light (bright), the right angle to the crystal (oblique-45 degrees) and the right magnification. Tough to see unless you put the watch on a surface, set up a camera on a tripod with a macro lens over the crystal, and put a bright, focused beam of light on the 6 o'clock area of the crystal.

Chris

hflee55
16 January 2009, 02:51 PM
nice review.

dex
19 February 2009, 12:18 PM
great review thanks

Rebel
19 February 2009, 12:56 PM
You did your homework.....thanks for your efforts in sharing this with TRF.

nwappraisals
21 February 2009, 02:34 AM
Great review, I'll be looking at one this weekend

Subexplorer
21 February 2009, 06:22 AM
Solar: Great review and pictures.
Very comprehensive! Enjoyed very much reading it.
I´ve just obtained my own SD yesterday, and wrote my own post at: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=68437
Completely agree with your comments. Great classic watch!
I only regret Rolex has discontinued its production.
Best cordial regards, Abel

9166
30 March 2009, 10:03 PM
Great write up. I ended up buying one M series last week. Glad that I did.

damoyorkie
14 June 2009, 05:51 AM
Fantastic review. I might have to reconsider my priorities now....

Jet
14 June 2009, 06:02 AM
Bravo!

9166
8 July 2009, 02:06 AM
Had mine for 9 months and loving it. It gets nearly 24X7 wrist time with me.

Solar
9 December 2010, 11:31 PM
Further to this topic, and as a post-script on the original review, I finally saw the Deep Sea Sea Dweller in the flesh last week.

You can clearly see the original Sea Dweller DNA in the new Deep Sea. There is a brawniness about the watch, an overdeveloped feel about it that really marks it clearly as a step above the regular Submariner.

I eventually traded my Sea Dweller since I found the lack of a cyclops made it too hard to read the date. When I saw the Deep Sea, everything that I loved about the Sea Dweller came flooding back to me in a wave; the thick bracelet, the heavier coin-edge bezel with the correspondingly deeper facets, making for a more light reflective surface that is unparalleled in low light. The matte black dial buried below so much sapphire crystal, the thick, beefy case.

If you can deal with the date window sans cyclops, I will still maintain that the Sea Dweller or the Deep Sea are the watches to beat when it comes to the sports models of the Rolex line.

If you have a Sea Dweller, cherish it. They're a beautiful design.

Chris

johnkszabo
15 January 2011, 01:13 PM
Very nice review!!

Nashvegas
27 January 2011, 11:18 AM
What a beautiful chuck of steel. A true classic in the Rolex line and hopefully my next watch. Your review only reinforces my love of this watch. Thanks!

vsighi
12 April 2011, 06:09 AM
Great review...:read:

Snowdog
17 April 2011, 01:10 AM
very thourough review
nice

Darkshark
26 June 2011, 01:00 PM
Very well done review!