View Full Version : F-series 100% BNIB Sea Dweller ..... Read On
Mark
5 April 2006, 11:56 AM
Well, great deals sometimes just fall into your hands. Don't have too much time to post all the details, but they will follow soon with pictures. Just got back from CA and heading to bed.
I now have two ... yes 2 "F" series Sea Dwellers. I am going to sell them both.
The first one is 100% BNIB with everything. Manuals, Rolex Pendant (Or whatever they call it now), papers, etc. Perfect !! $3900
The second one is 99% with everything. Manuals, Rolex Pendant (Or whatever they call it now), papers, etc. Perfect !! $3650
I guarantee these watches are perfect and 100% authentic.
I will only sell to established TRF members that I trust and trust me. If your interested, email me at rev@rolexforums.com .
Pictures are coming soon. :smokin:
JJ Irani
5 April 2006, 06:01 PM
Those are excellent prices for SDs, Mark. Good luck on the sale!!:thumbsup:
Tom
7 April 2006, 05:04 PM
Hey Mark, what's the difference in the 1%?
padi56
7 April 2006, 09:12 PM
Both excellent prices mark,the lightly worn one is a very good buy at $3650
Mark
8 April 2006, 09:30 AM
Hey Mark, what's the difference in the 1%?
Absolutely nothing with the watch. Only difference is one is BNIB and the other has been out of the box. These are perfect.
Email me if interested. There is also one added bonus I cannot mention here and is a biggie !
JJ Irani
8 April 2006, 09:34 AM
Absolutely nothing with the watch. Only difference is one is BNIB and the other has been out of the box. These are perfect.
Email me if interested. There is also one added bonus I cannot mention here and is a biggie !
Gosh....why wasn't I born in the United States of America? :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying:
Tom
8 April 2006, 01:24 PM
Damn you're tempting me!!!!!
Let me check with a friend, he might be interested. Also I might be, but I gotta check the bank book first!..
Thanks
dman
8 April 2006, 02:41 PM
Gosh....why wasn't I born in the United States of America? :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying:
Because it was not yet founded when you were born? :chuckle: :rofl:
JJ Irani
8 April 2006, 04:15 PM
Because it was not yet founded when you were born? :chuckle: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :thumbsup:
C.J.
8 April 2006, 04:21 PM
Gosh....why wasn't I born in the United States of America? :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying:
You may have been. Back in those days we were still one big Continent :rofl: :rofl:
JJ Irani
8 April 2006, 04:23 PM
You may have been. Back in those days we were still one big Continent :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Were you guys a part of India too?:thinking: :chuckle: :chuckle:
C.J.
8 April 2006, 04:27 PM
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Were you guys a part of India too?:thinking: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Maybe :thinking: The land bridge thing made for alot of confusion :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Mark
11 April 2006, 09:51 AM
Pictures as promised.
$3650.00
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/6993/markseadweller365016vn.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/2720/markseadweller365024nj.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
$3900
http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/5319/markseadweller390017ii.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/9763/markseadweller390020ne.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
JJ Irani
11 April 2006, 06:17 PM
Excellent pics, Mark...you are improving!! :clap: :clap: :chuckle: :chuckle:
mailman
11 April 2006, 08:10 PM
Very good pics Mark :thumbsup:
Mark
26 April 2006, 12:04 PM
Thanks guys. Can't wait to test my picture taking ability with the new Daytona arriving this week.
mailman
26 April 2006, 12:06 PM
Thanks guys. Can't wait to test my picture taking ability with the new Daytona arriving this week.
I could never tell that you're excited about it :chuckle:
newtamparealestate
28 April 2006, 03:20 PM
hmm, very tempting. I have 2 DJ right now, 1 SS and 1 TT. This is just like a sub but with no date or what else are the diffs? I might jump on the 99% one. Seems like a deal but I am not sure of the new retail. Guessing in the 4400 range? Can you PM me what the bonus is or let me know ? Thanks
Sean
newtamparealestate
28 April 2006, 03:20 PM
Also, if you are close, I might just drive over with cash and buy it if possible.
Atomic
28 April 2006, 11:56 PM
Maybe :thinking: The land bridge thing made for alot of confusion :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I am LOL @ Craig and Daren... :thumbsup:
hmm, very tempting. I have 2 DJ right now, 1 SS and 1 TT. This is just like a sub but with no date or what else are the diffs? I might jump on the 99% one. Seems like a deal but I am not sure of the new retail. Guessing in the 4400 range? Can you PM me what the bonus is or let me know ? Thanks
Sean
the seadweller is thicker and heavier than the Sub and although it doesn't have the raised lense over the date window (sorry forgotten the technical name) it does actually have a date feature
It also has a gas presure release valve on the opposite side to the crown and is certified waterproof to 1220m!! (4000ft!!)
great watch and to the casual glance looks like a sub but IMO much more individual.
JJ Irani
2 May 2006, 06:14 PM
the seadweller is thicker and heavier than the Sub and although it doesn't have the raised lense over the date window (sorry forgotten the technical name) it does actually have a date feature
It also has a gas presure release valve on the opposite side to the crown and is certified waterproof to 1220m!! (4000ft!!)
great watch and to the casual glance looks like a sub but IMO much more individual.
Yes, the SD is almost 2 mm thicker than the Sub. The Sub-date weighs 135 grams, while the SD = 148 grams. The Sub dial = 30 mm, but the SD dial = 29 mm.
And the raised lens over the date window is the Cyclops....it magnifies the date 2½ times.
As for the Helium valve (gas pressure valve release), it's highly unlikely (virtually 100%):chuckle: that you will ever need it. If you prefer the cyclops, then the Sub-Date is a more practical buy. If you prefer the smooth, flat crystal look, then the SD is KING!!:thumbsup:
Cheers - JJ
newtamparealestate
2 May 2006, 10:57 PM
Yes, the SD is almost 2 mm thicker than the Sub. The Sub-date weighs 135 grams, while the SD = 148 grams. The Sub dial = 30 mm, but the SD dial = 29 mm.
And the raised lens over the date window is the Cyclops....it magnifies the date 2 times.
As for the Helium valve (gas pressure valve release), it's highly unlikely (virtually 100%):chuckle: that you will ever need it. If you prefer the cyclops, then the Sub-Date is a more practical buy. If you prefer the smooth, flat crystal look, then the SD is KING!!:thumbsup:
Cheers - JJ
Thanks for the great info. :cheers: I never could figure out the small diffs. Now its a hard decision. I dont think the SD is for me as I am a huge fan of the cyclops.
JJ, how are you enjoying your YM? I have been debating on a YM TT or YM Platinum. :banghead: Cant decide.
JJ Irani
3 May 2006, 05:59 AM
Thanks for the great info. :cheers: I never could figure out the small diffs. Now its a hard decision. I dont think the SD is for me as I am a huge fan of the cyclops.
JJ, how are you enjoying your YM? I have been debating on a YM TT or YM Platinum. :banghead: Cant decide.
Thanks, Sean...I love my YM. Remember, I am a TT lover so my opinion could be biased. Both are superb looking watches. You would have to try them both at your AD. The price difference is insignificant, the TT one being a little more expensive. The TT is available with a choice of FOUR dials - BLUE, white, grey and champagne. I love BLUE....so here ya go...:chuckle: :chuckle:
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JJIrani/YM055.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/JJIrani/TTYM001.jpg
Rockrolex
6 May 2006, 08:37 AM
Well done, Mark. I hope they've gone to good homes with people who will take good care of those babies. :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :clap: :clap: :clap:
mailman
6 May 2006, 11:01 AM
Nice job Mark :thumbsup:
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.