View Single Post
Old 17 January 2024, 02:50 AM   #118
samson66
2024 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by texasmade View Post
They actually did do a lot better. First gen was about 14mm thick and this is 13mm thick.

At least Omega is actually listening to their customers on one thing which is thinner watches. Everything else though...
Yeah, and I understand that their watches do wear smaller than their stated size. But just that number 44.25mm is going to scare away customers who won't even go look at it. You would think by now they'd get that number down to 42-43 or simply lie about it like Rolex does.
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote