View Single Post
Old 5 August 2012, 05:48 PM   #32
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
I read the article recently, and I do agree it's a beautiful watch, I've thought many times about getting one. But, am I the only one who's a little concerned about the pretty sizable deviations and inconsistencies between different positions? If I recall there was a 15 second spread between positions, by comparison my Sub C has about a second difference max spread between all positions.

I love the look and feel of the 372, but it sure seems they have a little more work to do on the mvt. I also tried 2 Pams with in house mvts, both mvts had issues bnib. My 7750 based 24 otoh runs perfectly. I admit, I'm very leery of trusting their in house mvts just yet. It's a shame since so many of their models appeal to me, especially some of the 8 day versions.
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote