12 February 2008, 03:23 PM
|
#7
|
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy
No, it is in fact a misprint. Rolex never intended for the II's to look like ll's. Rolex reps have also confirmed this and approximately 250 left the factory looking like this. Since this model is no longer in production, only time will tell how much of a premium collectors will pay for such a rare rolex error.
|
250? Too low.
__________________
__________________
|
|
|