Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum - View Single Post - Sub-C VS. Explorer II 42mm

Bangel · 13 September 2012, 05:41 AM

From what you've written, it sounds like the Explorer II is more appealing to you in every way except concerns about its size.

I've never tried one on, but I do have a 42mm Tag as well as a sub c and any size difference between those is not noticeable to me. I agree that the sub c "wears big" for a 40mm watch.

Is it wise to swap? I wouldn't have thought so financially, but then wisdom often goes out the door when it comes to watch purchases!

13 September 2012, 05:41 AM	#20
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	From what you've written, it sounds like the Explorer II is more appealing to you in every way except concerns about its size. I've never tried one on, but I do have a 42mm Tag as well as a sub c and any size difference between those is not noticeable to me. I agree that the sub c "wears big" for a 40mm watch. Is it wise to swap? I wouldn't have thought so financially, but then wisdom often goes out the door when it comes to watch purchases!