View Single Post
Old 13 September 2012, 11:43 AM   #24
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by warrior View Post
I would enjoy the EXP II much more than the Sub-C.

EXP II because it's less common, less bling, no fat lugs, and more distinctive looking. As I mentioned in another thread, the shine and bling of the Sub gets tiresome after awhile. Just my opinion.
X2

I had the Sub C and sold it and now have the black dialed Explorer II, it is the best Rolex sport watch I have ever owned. I also hated the large clasp on the Sub C, it was just silly for someone who will never use it over a wet suit. I also am not a fan or the ceramic shine or the gloss dial, give me a matte dial every time and I will be happy. I also find the Explorer II to be way more comfortable on the wrist, it is just proportioned perfectly and is not as thick as the Sub C.

I tried to like the Sub C, but it was just not for me.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote