The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 January 2014, 09:22 AM   #1
Ignorant1
"TRF" Member
 
Ignorant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: run down shack
Watch: Oyster Speedking
Posts: 88
Experimenting with sleep positions . . .

I seem to recall a thread about what position is best to keep your watch over night for it to maintain the most accurate time.

Just wondering what quirks others may have found regarding their particular timepieces. This might just save someone from winding/resetting frequently.

My 6605 absolutely hates me when I make her sleep on her left side (crown up), and will either lose a great amount of time or stop completely. If I lay her on her right side (crown down - which I prefer not to do) she only loses a few minutes or seconds over night. But, if I lie her on her back (face up) then she sleeps like a baby and wakes up purring like a kitten spot on and raring to go.

Thanks,
and Happy New Year all . . . . .
Ignorant1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 10:09 AM   #2
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
Each watch will be different in different positions. I have a timegrapher that I check all my watches with. Best $200 I ever spent.
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 10:40 AM   #3
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignorant1 View Post
I seem to recall a thread about what position is best to keep your watch over night for it to maintain the most accurate time.

Just wondering what quirks others may have found regarding their particular timepieces. This might just save someone from winding/resetting frequently.

My 6605 absolutely hates me when I make her sleep on her left side (crown up), and will either lose a great amount of time or stop completely. If I lay her on her right side (crown down - which I prefer not to do) she only loses a few minutes or seconds over night. But, if I lie her on her back (face up) then she sleeps like a baby and wakes up purring like a kitten spot on and raring to go.

Thanks,
and Happy New Year all . . . . .
Sounds like it needs a service. Overnight position should only make one or maybe two secs difference at the most, not minutes.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 10:53 AM   #4
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
The old Rolex literature that you've seen around says dial up to gain a bit, crown up to lose a bit, and crown down to slow a tad more than that. I haven't seen that document with any recent Rolex I've purchased and don't think it affects the current gen very much.

In any event, anything more than a few seconds probably needs to be looked at.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 11:14 AM   #5
MitchSteel
"TRF" Member
 
MitchSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
None of my modern pieces are affected by positions, they all run right on, however the vintage models do.I leave my 1680 crown down as it gains a bit, and the 1675 crystal up overnight, which helps keep them running very much perfectly on time.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage

Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel
MitchSteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 04:42 PM   #6
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignorant1 View Post
I seem to recall a thread about what position is best to keep your watch over night for it to maintain the most accurate time.

Just wondering what quirks others may have found regarding their particular timepieces. This might just save someone from winding/resetting frequently.

My 6605 absolutely hates me when I make her sleep on her left side (crown up), and will either lose a great amount of time or stop completely. If I lay her on her right side (crown down - which I prefer not to do) she only loses a few minutes or seconds over night. But, if I lie her on her back (face up) then she sleeps like a baby and wakes up purring like a kitten spot on and raring to go.

Thanks,
and Happy New Year all . . . . .
sounds like it needs a service. Why do you have a problem with the crown-down position? RSC often rest them in that way, I have seen. I never pay any heed to the position of any of mine, and don't notice a difference in performance.
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 04:53 PM   #7
Ignorant1
"TRF" Member
 
Ignorant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: run down shack
Watch: Oyster Speedking
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
sounds like it needs a service. Why do you have a problem with the crown-down position? RSC often rest them in that way, I have seen. I never pay any heed to the position of any of mine, and don't notice a difference in performance.
It's just me not wanting to put excessive wear on the crown. That said I'd probably be better off using the case and stop laying it on top of the dresser.
Ignorant1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2014, 05:11 PM   #8
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,450
Just put a bit of cloth under it to stop minor scratches.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2014, 03:08 AM   #9
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
My 1665 gains one-two seconds overnight when in crown up position. If you are seeing minute differences, time for a visit to your watchmaker of choice mate...
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 07:03 PM   #10
SirPrize
"TRF" Member
 
SirPrize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: London
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Ferguson View Post
The old Rolex literature that you've seen around says dial up to gain a bit, crown up to lose a bit, and crown down to slow a tad more than that.
Is this the one?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg notice.jpg (71.5 KB, 86 views)
SirPrize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2014, 07:13 PM   #11
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,450
Yes.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2014, 10:13 AM   #12
Ignorant1
"TRF" Member
 
Ignorant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: run down shack
Watch: Oyster Speedking
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cc1966 View Post
My 1665 gains one-two seconds overnight when in crown up position. If you are seeing minute differences, time for a visit to your watchmaker of choice mate...
Actually, it was just serviced - so I'm now torn between wondering if it is just the nature of this particular model; or, if there is a problem ???

I've been monitoring the watch for the past 10 days, while keeping it on it's back at night - it has only lost 24 seconds which factors out at -02.5 p/d.

Guess I'll just keep a watch on it for a bit longer....

"Thanks" for all the input though!
__________________
Roger 呂若
Ignorant1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2014, 10:37 AM   #13
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignorant1 View Post
Actually, it was just serviced - so I'm now torn between wondering if it is just the nature of this particular model; or, if there is a problem ???

I've been monitoring the watch for the past 10 days, while keeping it on it's back at night - it has only lost 24 seconds which factors out at -02.5 p/d.

Guess I'll just keep a watch on it for a bit longer....

"Thanks" for all the input though!
-2.5 per day is within spec. Perhaps just a regulation tweak away from being perfect. Personally I like them just a bit fast. +2.5 would be golden.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.