ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 March 2014, 08:29 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Blue Planet
Watch: 5
Posts: 1,201
|
I did think about buying one for my son but in truth, when he graduates or I pop it I'll buy him a new one or he can have one or all of mine. If I had a son today I may be tempted to buy a safe queen to keep for 21 yrs, then again.......
|
30 March 2014, 08:52 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
Primordial watches existed when I was born (1947) but those without facelifts have corroded dials, discolored lumes, creaky mechanisms, and beat-up cases--much like my face and body. Likewise, getting them them back in shape is problematic. I'd like to have a 1947 Bubbleback with a California dial but I haven't found the right one yet. My enthusiasm for this idea is decreasing with time for some reason.
|
30 March 2014, 09:49 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Qld / Aus
Watch: 5711
Posts: 150
|
I hunted down a birthyear 1680 and am very happy I did. It took a while as 76 wasn't an easy year to find.
For some strange reason it just feels right - I have flipped a few watches but its going nowhere. To each their own I guess |
30 March 2014, 11:02 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 822
|
Quote:
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I may relook at that 1680 Red birthyear |
|
30 March 2014, 11:39 PM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
Quote:
Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk |
|
31 March 2014, 12:18 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
1965 year
Quote:
I really enjoy this beater 1968 year Omega watch, it's still a 1960's watch, just not my birthyear...
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
|
31 March 2014, 12:26 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA/Denmark
Posts: 651
|
|
31 March 2014, 12:46 AM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,425
|
I totally understand the appeal (I should, since I shelled out a pretty penny to get my '66 gilt!). I think in a lot of ways, it speaks to whatever sentimental, creative, and even a romanticizing aspect of who we are. Plus, it's something a lot of us wear every day, it's (literally) attached to us, and very much so evokes our personality. Just as some Rolex wearers have no desire to buy a 48 year-old watch in used condition, I find absolutely no desire whatsoever to buy a brand new Rolex. To me, they look exactly the same and have no personality. This is purely a subjective point of view. But, something vintage, with character, and that which has aged in its own way, is so beautiful and unique to me. And having one from the year I was born is just an added bonus. It doesn't mean much, but just KNOWING that it, too, is from 1966 is very cool. In a strange way, at least for me, it makes the relationship w my watch that much stronger. There's more of a connection.
(Jesus, its sounds like I'm in love with the damned thing!) |
31 March 2014, 12:56 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: all of them
Posts: 653
|
|
31 March 2014, 12:59 AM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,425
|
|
31 March 2014, 01:18 AM | #41 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,920
|
There is some satisfaction in saying (when someone notices your Rolex) "It's as old as I am, and just as good looking"
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
31 March 2014, 05:50 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 268
|
If I lived a million years, there are three things that I just will never understand the concept of. 1. Birth year items, 2. Caravans, 3. Barbeques.
|
31 March 2014, 05:58 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: all of them
Posts: 653
|
I have to say, there is something about it for me. I don't really know why, but I definitely want a birth year watch...maybe a DRSD! Now that would be very cool.
I'm sure if I spent considerable time and money in therapy I might find out what childhood neglect I've got buried deep down inside that makes me want something born when I was. Or maybe it's just because I never had a brother. But I'd rather spend money on watches over therapy. |
31 March 2014, 01:07 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 671
|
I like em.
Got my Red sub from 69 ; )
__________________
- "M" 16600 Sea-Dweller - "A" GMT 16700. -“A” 16613LB Sub - 1680 Red Sub, Mark II, "Full Set" - 116660 DSSD D-Blue, 124060, 126613LN, 116710BLNR - 116500LN White Dial - “U” 16610 “SWISS” dial |
31 March 2014, 01:20 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,027
|
I want a 1655 from 1981... The year I lost my virginity
|
31 March 2014, 01:21 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,027
|
|
31 March 2014, 02:01 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
i wouldnt mind having a birth year watch. But 1986 is slim pickings though for a vintage collector.
|
31 March 2014, 03:35 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,297
|
|
31 March 2014, 04:43 PM | #49 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,122
|
While I do not have one, I like the idea of a birth year watch. I don't know if I would go out of my way to get one or pay a premium for one but to wear a watch in good condition and perfect running order that is the same age as me would be pretty cool. If the right deal was to come around who knows..., maybe I'll get one.
|
31 March 2014, 05:29 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,095
|
I own a couple of them so: a yes for me.
|
31 March 2014, 06:52 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
|
|
31 March 2014, 11:23 PM | #52 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Just Fly Casual
Posts: 698
|
Quote:
|
|
31 March 2014, 11:36 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PA
Watch: SubLV, 1665 Rail
Posts: 1,054
|
I had been looking for one, but then found the specific model I was looking for in pristine condition that was not in my birth year. I purchased the watch, not the estimated year of production. That being said, I can appreciate the sentiment of those who do purchase birth year watches
__________________
|
31 March 2014, 11:40 PM | #54 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,444
|
Quote:
|
|
31 March 2014, 11:46 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
For me yes, as I'd be buying an A serial 16520 Zenith daytona..prefer my plastic daytona's
|
1 April 2014, 12:05 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,829
|
I'd much rather have the no-crown-guard Sub my father is wearing in this photo (I'm about 1), but unfortunately it was traded in after suffering water damage in the early '70s.
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
1 April 2014, 12:15 AM | #57 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,444
|
Great photo, I wish I had my dad's watch too. He only had a Smiths pocket watch, but would love to have it.
|
1 April 2014, 01:56 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
|
I have mine, but it was more of a happy coincidence than anything else. I've always wanted a transitional Speedy, and this one from 1968 just happened to be for sale as I was in one of my search modes. It's clearly not perfect and has its share of dings and dents, just like me. Just kinda neat to know that this thing has been ticking for about as long as me.
|
1 April 2014, 06:09 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: ex SF, back east
Posts: 531
|
at first i really liked the idea. but truth be told, it was mostly just an excuse to buy another watch.
And if I'm going to buy another watch, it might as well be because I LOVE it. I'm also not 100% convinced of any of the serial number tables...along with the idea that those watches sat around the dealers for years at times, so getting a pinpoint date is probably not a sure thing. |
1 April 2014, 06:17 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Alex
Location: England (andover)
Watch: Submariners all
Posts: 470
|
My 66 sub is my wife's birth year does that count .
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.