ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 September 2012, 05:18 AM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
|
6 September 2012, 05:48 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
Quote:
In a not completely unrelated development, I've decided that it would be pointless to discuss the merits of a brand or movement with you. |
|
6 September 2012, 07:06 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
Words simply cannot express the disappointment I feel right now...I was so looking forward to yet more insightful commentary like "3135 ftw", "go go 3135", etc...ah, well, such is life. Thank you for your invaluable contributions to the thread, and enjoy your 3135.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
6 September 2012, 10:10 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,254
|
I just recently purchased a PO. Today is my second day wearing it. I am constantly looking at the rolex forum and I saw one of the members with the PO and I just had to have one. (I think it was Dingoo)...
Anyway I wrote this on the WUS forum for a similar discussion. I chose the 2500 and this was my rationale: 1: Price. 2. I like the solid case-back. I think it's cool to see the movement is display case-backs, but on this watch I think the sea horse creature is way cooler. 3. thickness 4. I like the overall look of the bezel better (black) 5. They are becoming scarce. So if you want one, you better get it now. I really should have waited on this purchase, but I didn't want to miss out. 6. Looks more vintagey classic (is that a made up word? If so then I'll trade mark it ) Things I like about the 8500 1. movement, well supposedly it's better (or at least all in house) 2. I really like the metal applied 6,9,12 3. The orange seamaster type is a nice splash of color with out being too much 4 the fact the bezel is ceramic (scratch resistant?) but wish it was black But overall these did not outweigh my 2500 preferences. This is just my opinion. |
7 September 2012, 04:51 AM | #65 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
I've read and appreciated your posts throughout the forum so I'm a little surprised when you claim your a publisher etc. and then, reading the title of this thread and what the op wants, you just throw 3135 in the mix. I say this as a person who likes Rolex more, but that's not what this thread is about. I'd rather talk more with the guy complaining about his Pam and choosing an 85 than where this thread has gone. |
|
7 September 2012, 07:50 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: Sandy Hook, NJ
Watch: 14060
Posts: 18
|
I own a 2500. have worn it for dress and while diving off the Bahamas.
I intend to get an 8500 as I find the 8500's independent 12 hour hand to be a highly desireable feature for traveling across time zones. |
7 September 2012, 04:17 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
To answer the OP's question - I'm both! I have the 42mm black 8500 and a 42mm orange 2500 that were purchased at the same time following sale of a Panerai that wasn't getting much wrist action.
In the few months I've owned the POs, I've found no discernible difference in performance - both are very accurate. The 8500, being a bit thicker, is heavier on the wrist but I'm OK with that since I also have a Milgauss and Deepsea. Why did I buy both? Why not? When I got the 8500 I also enquired about the orange 2500 and was told that it's being phased out. After a bit of research, I found that very few ADs had any in stock, so I decided to bite the bullet and go for it rather than kick myself later for not getting it new or wait until one surfaced in the secondhand market. No regrets at all - the 2500 is a beautiful watch! |
8 September 2012, 01:27 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Perth Australia
Watch: Omega planet ocean
Posts: 3
|
Just got hold of my PO 42mm with Orange Basel, from TRF looks stunning! One of the best looking dive watches on the market today and great value, 8500 movement looks stunning with the sapphire glass back casing.
|
9 September 2012, 01:37 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Personally, I would not switch a SubC for a 2500. The 8500 is a superb movement but there are few watchmakers who know how to service it, whereas just about any watchmaker can service a 3135. Movement wise I would put them in this order
8500 3135 2500 but these movements are all chronometer grade and properly regulated are capable of the same excellent time keeping. There are many other factors besides movement you need to take into consideration, like which watch do you like on your wrist and resale values if you think you will ever flip. Let us know what you decide.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
9 September 2012, 01:49 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
He already made his choice and got a PO with the 2500, specifically a liquidmetal LE:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=253018 I got the same piece a few weeks ago, and so far it's the most accurate in the collection.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
9 September 2012, 01:50 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
That 2500 LM is a brilliant, brilliant watch, congrats on that choice OP!
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
9 September 2012, 02:41 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Ok, missed that thread.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
9 September 2012, 08:40 AM | #73 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex and Omega
Posts: 553
|
I have a 8500 but I am going back to the 2500. I personally prefer the lower profile of the 2500. I've had 6 different watches with the 2500 movement and have never had a problem.
__________________
Regards, Steve |
15 September 2012, 11:21 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
2500 is more dressy
8500 is more sporty |
19 September 2012, 05:52 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 78
|
2500 myself.... although can appreciate a nice 8500!!
|
20 September 2012, 12:29 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 652
|
|
20 September 2012, 05:55 PM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Eirik
Location: Norway
Watch: Rolex/Omega/PAM
Posts: 1,160
|
I got the cal 2500, but I also like the 8500. What`s not to like with either?
(and sorry for the two off topic watches in this picture!) |
22 September 2012, 08:42 AM | #78 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
|
22 September 2012, 10:28 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
Quantum of Solace limited edition.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
22 September 2012, 11:59 AM | #80 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 540
|
ETA assembles the 8500 for OMEGA. ETA OMEGA under swatch umbrella. 8500 more like in family
|
22 September 2012, 12:48 PM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
|
|
22 September 2012, 11:58 PM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
|
Am on the search for a 2500, no luck yet. I like the slimmer profile.
|
5 October 2012, 12:41 AM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 514
|
Had the PO 8500. Sold it and got the PO 2500 instead. Much slimmer and better looking imo. The PO 8500 is sporty looking while the 2500 is the perfect balance between sporty and elegant. Also didn't like the grey bezel and thickness if the PO 8500. The PO 2500 is a classic.
|
6 October 2012, 06:11 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: london
Watch: GMT IIC
Posts: 14
|
2500 all the way! oriignal, reliable and hard to get now. my is 42mm and only beaten by my 116710 GMT for looks and price
|
6 October 2012, 06:16 AM | #85 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: london
Watch: GMT IIC
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
|
|
6 October 2012, 09:44 AM | #86 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Mark B
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 15400ST
Posts: 461
|
I was hoping someone would point that out.
__________________
-Mark There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy. - William Shakespeare Uva Uvam Vivendo Varia Fit |
6 October 2012, 11:02 AM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
Thanks! Pales in comparison to lots of 'em 'round these parts, though...
I assume you meant accuracy-wise; it is plenty accurate, runs in vicinity of 2-3 seconds a day fast (I personally prefer running fast to running slow, no chance of being late and easier to set to correct time, just stop it and start it back up when time catches up to it). It is an amazing piece, no doubt about it. Definitely one of my favorites and gets lots of wrist time (in case you meant non-accuracy wise :) )
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
6 October 2012, 11:35 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pacifica, CA
Watch: Double Red SD
Posts: 307
|
2500 is a heck of a bargain, I think. Dimension and style are pretty timeless, too.
|
6 October 2012, 12:30 PM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: Houston
Watch: Rolex, Omega, IWC
Posts: 321
|
I had the 2500c
After having it stop 3 x and in for service each time for 6-8 wks I sold it and got the 8500 I did like the lower profile of the 2500 but it wasn't worth the trouble anymore Kind of glad it happened now....I love the 8500! So glad I went orange too. |
6 October 2012, 09:25 PM | #90 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: EU
Watch: them come and go..
Posts: 2,052
|
I'll be 2500 for sure,better hurry before they become hard to find.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.