ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Sub or Exp?? | |||
Keep the Sub-C! | 238 | 55.09% | |
Go for the Exp II 42, you will love it!! | 194 | 44.91% | |
Voters: 432. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
13 September 2012, 06:25 AM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
|
Quote:
I dont have a problem test driving an Explorer 42 as I would probably be getting a pre-owned model and could easily flip it if needed. On another note I just went to Rolex on 5th ave and tried it on and it looks nice in person and nice on my wrist. I was wearing my GMT so I did not compare it to the Sub-C (totally forgot to ask the salesperson to bring one as well) The problem is that the bracelet was not sized, so it may be that once its sized the case might look large on my wrist. |
|
13 September 2012, 11:09 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,667
|
Here's the bottom line with regards to these watches. People want to look good and also have their watches reflect who they are...or who they ideally want to be. Let's be honest about this, right?.
The ceramic Subs/GMTs are initially eye catching and fantastically made, no doubt. But, what I focus on is what I think is timeless, what I think is going to look good years from now. More bling, shinyness=more likely to grow old fast. I mean real fast. This is my opinion. Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.