ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 October 2011, 07:14 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: Denmark
Watch: GMT M II
Posts: 42
|
New Explorer II 42mm or GMT Master II c
Hi Guys, I am on the door step of my first Rolex after just rounding 50....
The wife has smiled at me and gave me the "you deserve it darling" So now I stand with the choice of new X II or the GMT Master..... I have a real need for the GMT function as we live in India moving ( home in Denmark) soon to Bahrain, the GMT Master II has been my grail for life and now I have seen the new explorer black dial..... and I am lost for choice !!!! I feel like I am betraying my old grail and leaving it on the shelf for a new face in the Rolex brand........ Now is it worth it!! is the new Explorer with new movment that much better than the classic GMT.... I would like to here the opinions of you gentlemen with the GMT and the Explorer. Br. Regards Michael.... |
8 October 2011, 08:34 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Really tough choice. I own the GMT-IIc and i saw in real life the new Explorer recently. Personally i really like the posh looks of the GMT-IIc although the 42mm of the Explorer are tempting.
Saying all this i would not flip my GMT-IIc. Maybe get an Expy one day yes. For now my next one is the DSSD. |
8 October 2011, 08:38 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
The GMTIIC still gets my vote.
Either way you can't go wrong, get the one you like the most.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
8 October 2011, 08:46 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
I suggest you to go with the GMTIIC.
Here below a pic of mine. Ciao Engi |
8 October 2011, 09:03 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
stick to the GMTIIC! it is still a notch "higher" than the ExpII... besides, ExpII prices are still crazy now!!!
BUT.... if you really, really like the ExpII, then i guess you already know the answer to your question... try them both on and see what sings to you more... |
8 October 2011, 10:50 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: Denmark
Watch: GMT M II
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
I have had the GMT on my wrist and it sits like a glove the braclet is peace of art on its own..... and I like the 3 time zone function which the Explorer is short of!! Just looking at the picture confirms my direction!! but the orange GMT arrow and the 42 mm is apealing and the phantom type hands....very cool indeed, looks like I will take my grail from the shelf and I will post the event when it comes round!! This quite hard to make my mind up...but thanks guys |
|
9 October 2011, 12:26 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in the sky
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
|
|
9 October 2011, 12:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: USA
Watch: me go all out
Posts: 1,183
|
Easy choice: GMT II C.
|
9 October 2011, 02:06 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Ed
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,750
|
GMTC for me
|
9 October 2011, 02:10 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,461
|
Not that 50 is "old," but for you I would recommend the GMT-IIc. The Exp42, with the oversize hands and the orange, just looks a little much IMO.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
9 October 2011, 02:13 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
I would opt for the Ex2.
|
9 October 2011, 02:19 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Ca.
Watch: DSSD JC
Posts: 796
|
Easy for me to say GMT II-C, cause I have one and love it. I did pick up a vintage 1675 GMT master (1978). I put on the 1675 and put the 116710LN in the winder. It's been there ever since!!!! I like not having to think about scratching the PCL's. I think the new EXP-42 will be the bomb!!! You can still keep track of another time zone. If you need two or three than step towards the GMT-C. I suggest look at them side by side. I always though the white face EXP would be a nice addition but when I tried it on, I found that it wasn't me. Decide, side by side IMHO.
__________________
GMT Master II 116710LN, GMT Master 1675 Pepsi, Submariner 16610LV, Sea Dweller 126600 SD43, DSSD-“JC” 136660, GMT Master II 126710 BLRO |
9 October 2011, 02:44 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116710LN & 116201
Posts: 849
|
I'm in the same pickle. It will all boil down to whichever one is available at the AD. If they both are I think I'll flip a coin.
|
9 October 2011, 03:54 AM | #14 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: Denmark
Watch: GMT M II
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
I am leaning towards the GMT as this has all my needs!!! and has been my grail for ages, but the X2 is fresh and with new movment!!! This is a bugger of a choice..................I put 8000 USD down and now have the option but what ever the choice I make it will be a Rolex... Looks like a lot of GMT owners have an opinion but not so many Explorer II owners.... I am chuffed to bits with the response guys ... I think its true though it will be the Magpie in me that makes the final call.. Br. Michael |
|
9 October 2011, 03:56 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
GMTc
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
9 October 2011, 04:10 AM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: Denmark
Watch: GMT M II
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
But they both are so good a choice.... looks like GMT is leading 7:1 Br. Michael |
|
9 October 2011, 04:24 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116710LN & 116201
Posts: 849
|
The Exp has more of a sports look. The GMT is more of an allrounder.
|
9 October 2011, 04:47 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Tom
Location: USA
Posts: 1,264
|
GMTc two-tone gets my vote. It's a masterpiece.
|
9 October 2011, 04:48 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,888
|
Try them both at the AD to give you a better feel for them on your wrist. I would pick the GMTc out of choice.
|
9 October 2011, 04:55 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Even though I own a GMT IIC I'd have to opt for the older version. I'm starting to loss the love for these super sized watches. Too in your face. They look kind of funny to me.
|
9 October 2011, 05:03 AM | #21 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Japan
Watch: Daytona and others
Posts: 3,018
|
Quote:
You really can't go wrong with either; they are both great watches; but my infatuation with the new Explorer II waned proportionally to my renewed fascination with the GMT IIC as I wore it daily. I also don't think there is any meaningful difference in timekeeping quality between the two models. It just gets down to personal choice. Get the one you really want. You really can't go wrong on this one. |
|
9 October 2011, 06:02 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I really like my GMTIIC but I have not tried on the Exp 42 yet so I guess I'm not much help. I think you really need to decide which makes you say "perfect".
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
9 October 2011, 05:37 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
I have not seen the new Expy yet, but I know I will like my GMT IIc more. I want the Expy, but it doesn't change my opinion that the GMT IIc is the best all-around watch in the company's current line. It's incredible. The fact that it is currently cheaper is crazy, and IMO only due to it being a design that is more than half a decade old at this point... which doesn't change the fact it is a better watch.
For reference I have a black-dial Exp2 from the prior edition and the GMT IIc, but I have not, frankly, seen or tried on the new Exp2. I will say that after purchasing an Exp2 as my first Rolex, the GMT was the first most obvious upgrade I went for. I loved the GMT hand on both watches, and I wanted a bezel that interfaced with it well for additional functionality. |
9 October 2011, 05:47 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
It depends which one you like more. For me I would choose GMTIIc as the new Exp II doesn't do anything for me. If its your first and only Rolex then the GMTIIc would be a better choice, Exp II looks little plain compared to it but I have not seen one in real life so take what I said with a grain of salt.
Last edited by watchf; 9 October 2011 at 05:51 PM.. Reason: Spelling |
9 October 2011, 06:10 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,419
|
gmt ii c is a great watch, perfect for any moment in your life. Sporty and classy at the same moment. Take it with no doubt
__________________
forever rolex |
9 October 2011, 06:59 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Explorer II.
|
9 October 2011, 08:29 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Asia
Watch: PP AP PAM ROLEX
Posts: 495
|
GMTc
__________________
TRF AP OWNERS CLUB |
9 October 2011, 08:34 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: thewatchguy
Location: UK
Watch: me buy gold..
Posts: 7,441
|
I've still not seen a Exp42 yet in the fleshl; so I'm biased. GMTIIc
__________________
Instagram.. @thewatchguy www.thewatchguyofficial.co.uk Got a GREEN Submariner 116610LV.. Visit the official thread here! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=179580 Don't forget to visit the Rolex & Attire thread too! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=215077 |
9 October 2011, 08:35 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Watch: Rolex/Ω/Seiko
Posts: 90
|
RolexGMTman, GMT IIC will still be more suitable for you i guess, You still have to decider as you will have to wear it everyday, i will go for GMT IIC, i want to get it by Christmas... :)
|
9 October 2011, 08:37 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
first Rolex - 116710LN
2nd Rolex - 216570 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.