Subdued DNA of 226570 Exp2's

[Lu..]

So for years I've been struggling with which model to get....I've tried on so many models and have not had one that jumps out to me that says this is it......

With our 30th being later this year....the wife & I will be exchanging nice gifts and she wants me to get a Rolex, she'll have it engraved, etc...etc.....

We went to the AD together and I asked for the 124060 (yes, know it might take months, years, but I can wait)....I've never seen this model and think the 126610 is too blingy....too be honest, I think I like the Exp1 (224270) more but think it is blingy as well....

Following what others have said about the 5 digits...the AD had several CPO models ...14060...16600 (which was amazed how much I liked it)....loved the size..but felt those were blingy as well....

I've worn the new Polar Exp2 several times ....and there is something about that model that makes me come back to it....love the dial....does not feel huge on my wirst....and it's not blingy....perhaps it is because there is no exposed polished gold on the dial.....so here is my main question....

is the black dial Exp2 as flashy like the 5 digit subs....I've never seen an exhibition model to try on....my though process is the black dial will have a lower wrist presence vs the Polar when wearing it in public, but maybe I'm just over-thinking this entire process....

Thanks for listening....