Which one would you pick...?? 5512, 5513, or 1675

[SL BRABUS]

"Hi" members.....

Thinking of getting into vantage Rolex Circa 1976-1977 (serial numbers mid 4million to high 5million)

Which one you prefer and which one is more desirable....

Please tell me why.....

1. Submariner Ref. 5512
2. Submariner Ref. 5513
3. GMT Master Ref. 1675

Thanks....

[jdmi32]

I think these are within your range and would be my order of preference.

1. 1675 Radial
2. 5513 Maxi MKI dial
3. 5512

[springer]

GMT 1675 - more function than a Submariner, more color and more character.

[datejust24]

I'd go with a Maxi MKI 5513...desirable? absolutely...why? well why not...

[omitohud]

Originally Posted by jdmi32

I think these are within your range and would be my order of preference.

1. 1675 Radial
2. 5513 Maxi MKI dial
3. 5512

Can't disagree



I blame it on the autoconnect.

[harry in montreal]

One of each

[ADINVA]

Would a 5513 Maxi Dial cost more than a 5513 Serif or Non-Serif? If so, is it simply because it is relatively "newer" or because the maxi dial itself looks better?

Would a Maxi MK V cost less than a MK 1? Assuming both pieces are in good shape. Just curious.

[SL BRABUS]

Please be patient with me.....

I'm new with the vintage Rolex....

What the different with the 1675 Radial & 1675 non Radial....??

Pictures for comparison would be great...

Is there any love for the Non Serif or Serif Dial dial for the 5512 or 5513....??

Any input will be greatly appreciated....

[jdmi32]

Originally Posted by SL BRABUS

What the different with the 1675 Radial & 1675 non Radial....??

Sam's watch shown above is a radial and mine below is not. Notice the difference between the hour plots.

[ADINVA]

The plots are more distanced from the markers?

[jdmi32]

Originally Posted by ADINVA

The plots are more distanced from the markers?

That's it. Looks like Sam also has an all red GMT hand (very nice!) on his GMT. Radial dials are much more rare.

[ADINVA]

Until you point that out, I was struggling to see the differences. So subtle! Thanks for pointing out. Cheers, KY.

[Frogman4me]

If you do not own any submariner then I would go with the 5512/5513. If you have one then the 1675. But to be honest with those three choices you can't lose. All great references worth owning. Best wishes on the hunt.

[Toronto Soup King]

I own the 1675 and the 5513 (and a 1016 and 16550, heaven help me) and about the only thing I'd say here is the 1675 doesn't have a quickset date, making it a PITA to deal with. I tend to wear mine only a few days a month rather than spend five minutes cranking that crown to get the date right whenever it's time to wear it.

If you're going for a daily wearer I think the 1675 is more interesting than the 5513, but you can't lose with either. I find whichever Rolex I happen to be wearing becomes my favourite for the day!

Best of luck with your purchase

[subtona]

5512 or 13 whichever is in the best condition.

[SL BRABUS]

Originally Posted by omitohud

Can't disagree


Sam your watch look GREAT.....


I blame it on the autoconnect.

Originally Posted by jdmi32

Sam's watch shown above is a radial and mine below is not. Notice the difference between the hour plots.

Ky thank you for taking your time to explain to me....

Man your watch is NICE....!!!

[SL BRABUS]

Thank you guys for all the great advices.....

Now the only problem is hunting for 1 of those watch, which won't be easy.....

There will be many more questions when I find the right one....

Hopefully you guys will able to help me pick the right one without getting rip off.....

There so many thing to learn about the vintage Rolex, which I'm not use to....

Unlike the newer Rolex is easier to know what to look for....

Looking forward to be part of the vintage Rolex crowds soon.....!!

Best Regards,
Tony

[Roger_Smith]

That radial GMT is beautiful with the Fuschia insert and red hand.....could someone please chime in on the history of the red hand?

[Roger_Smith]

edit: Sorry double post.

[descartes]

Originally Posted by subtona

5512 or 13 whichever is in the best condition.

^^^^^ This. I was actually looking for a 5512, but came across this meters first 5513 (with original guarantee and service papers) and grabbed it instead.

[jdmi32]

Originally Posted by SL BRABUS

Ky thank you for taking your time to explain to me....

Man your watch is NICE....!!!

Thank you Tony.

For peace of mind, you can always ask the good folks here for guidance before making any purchase. Good luck in your hunt...it's more than half the fun.

[omitohud]

Originally Posted by Toronto Soup King

I own the 1675 and the 5513 (and a 1016 and 16550, heaven help me) and about the only thing I'd say here is the 1675 doesn't have a quickset date, making it a PITA to deal with. I tend to wear mine only a few days a month rather than spend five minutes cranking that crown to get the date right whenever it's time to wear it.

If you're going for a daily wearer I think the 1675 is more interesting than the 5513, but you can't lose with either. I find whichever Rolex I happen to be wearing becomes my favourite for the day!

Best of luck with your purchase

Agree that u can't lose with either. That said if quick set is important to u, then get a 16750 with matte dial. Problem solved.


I blame it on the autoconnect.

[omitohud]

Originally Posted by SL BRABUS

Ky thank you for taking your time to explain to me....



Man your watch is NICE....!!!

Thanks man. It's not easy finding one especially in that condition. Just b patient n the right one will come along. Just make sure u check with members here first. Good luck.


I blame it on the autoconnect.

[Robbyvm]

i would go for a 5513 or 5512 first and then (and there will be a next vintage i'm sure) hunt a nice 1675 to add to the collection

here's my Gilt 1675

[SL BRABUS]

Originally Posted by omitohud

Thanks man. It's not easy finding one especially in that condition. Just b patient n the right one will come along. Just make sure u check with members here first. Good luck.


I blame it on the autoconnect.

Will do, Sam.....

Thank you....

Originally Posted by Robbyvm

i would go for a 5513 or 5512 first and then (and there will be a next vintage i'm sure) hunt a nice 1675 to add to the collection

here's my Gilt 1675

Thanks for the advice & thanks for showing your awesome 1675......^^^....

[rootbeer7]

Now this is what TRF is about. Beautiful watches and brilliant advice. Good luck in your hunt

[bncapass1]

I started with the sub and ended with the 1675 GMT and never looked back.

[waspy1]

Note that there are very few 1975-1977 watches out there for some reason so if you are sure about sticking to this serial range you could have a long wait for the right watch. Personally for me I'd go for 5513 over 5512 unless gilt model. But in the end whichever turns up in the right condition, just jump on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SL BRABUS]

Since waspy1 mentioned & it so true...^^^....

Could somebody explain why it's hard to find those Circa 1975-1977..??...

Is there anything special for those years.....??.....

Thanks in advance.....

[omitohud]

I think the speculation was that those were bad yrs for mechanical watches due to the introduction of Quartz?


I blame it on the autoconnect.