ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 September 2016, 06:31 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 40
|
Converting a 78790 link to a 78360 link??
Greetings,
My understanding is that both links are essentially the same except that the 78790 link has polished sides while the 78360 has brushed sides. Would using a Scotchbrite pad to the polished sides of the 78790 link easily turn it into a 78360 or am I way off here? |
9 September 2016, 08:56 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,068
|
Sure.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
9 September 2016, 09:10 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,616
|
Yes essentially the same
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.470.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
9 September 2016, 03:05 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 40
|
Great. Any recommendations on how best to use the Scotchbrite? I assume sand along the long axis of the side of the link?
|
9 September 2016, 09:52 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
^I'm not in favor of mutilating your watch or bracelet.
|
10 September 2016, 01:37 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 629
|
Quote:
93150/93250 links have brushed sides... |
|
31 October 2016, 11:09 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,071
|
Hmmm... I don't think they are the same. Here is a pic side by side. The one on the top is from an S series 16700 w/ 78360 bracelet (ca. 1994); and the two on the bottom are from a T series 16570 w/ 78390 bracelet (ca. 1996).
Both have polished sides but the 78360 link has a noticeably "shorter" connecting hole. It is almost identical to the hole found on 93150 links (with brushed sides). The 78790 is the same size but with "longer" connecting hole. Hope this helps! |
7 November 2016, 09:27 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,071
|
Not sure why the pic above did not show up...
Here it is again: |
8 November 2016, 08:02 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Paris
Posts: 2,541
|
.
Some times ago I published this chart showing links compatibility. 78360 and 78790 clearly use the same ref#. |
8 November 2016, 10:57 AM | #10 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,068
|
Quote:
When it is not connected in the bracelet the center link will slide in and out - it just isn't out as far as the other in the photo.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.