ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 September 2009, 07:44 AM | #121 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: KADEN
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 179
|
Just reread the thread completely....
For those who can't fathom the idea of Rolex being a good investment, then you just are not doing it right. I currently have 3 Rolex that I have bought in the last few months. I GUARANTY I will make a profit on these when I decide to sell them after years of use and enjoyment. The key is buying at a low point. if that can be done, selling will always be at a profit. (IE Good investment) Investment aside, I purchased these also as a Hedge against the dollar and the collapsing economy. Seems like alot of your "traders" and "investors" are alot more optimistic about our market and economy than I am. I personally hold ZERO cash besides my next 3 months of spending. Dollar is going down the drain and I am not going to be the one caught holding the bag.... |
17 September 2009, 07:51 AM | #122 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Rolex, Harley's, Corvettes, Stamps.......there is always some money to be made/traded/lost. There is also a chance you will have some fun while you collect AND enjoy wearing a fine watch to boot. There is even a small chance that your watch will end up as valuable as mine did. Whatever you do, one thing is for sure.......you will look good.
|
17 September 2009, 09:18 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Herbert Frank
Location: Middletown,De
Watch: President
Posts: 1,641
|
Anyone who has purchased , Coins, Stamps, Art, Antiques as an "investment" and is not a dealer in those items can testify as to the lack of profit in those items. Unless you are VERY astute and can buy the item now that will become "hot" at the time you wish to sell you are facing an uphill battle. You can beat the dealers markup so the resale value of any item ( except the very "hot" one) is greatly diminished. Add to that the maintenance cost, loss of use of the money, a watch like all the above is a luxury item whose additive value is in the eye ( or wrist) of the wearer.
That being said, I love my GMT IIc and if I get many years of wear from it I will be thrilled.
__________________
Time and Tide wait for no man Rolex Cellini 4133 Tudor North Flag HERS: Rolex TTDJ |
17 September 2009, 09:20 AM | #124 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Herbert Frank
Location: Middletown,De
Watch: President
Posts: 1,641
|
Want a partner?
Let me know your time period, rate of return and collateral for your Guarantee and I might just become a partner.
__________________
Time and Tide wait for no man Rolex Cellini 4133 Tudor North Flag HERS: Rolex TTDJ |
17 September 2009, 09:25 AM | #125 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
I paid for 2 services plus a bracelet and bezel. The watch is worth a pretty penny so my rate of return is astronomical and I have a guarantee from Rolex for 1 year. Not too shabby.
These guys on here are pretty astute IMO. Your quote "Unless you are VERY astute and can buy the item now that will become "hot" at the time you wish to sell you are facing an uphill battle". They buy many watches so the odds of buying the watch that will become "hot" goes up, stastically speaking. If it doesn't then they may lose some money but usually the watch will hold its value and the money isn't lost. To comment on the "use of the money"; the money is more stable in a Rolex than in many other investments. Housing/property for one is an example of an investment that has been hit hard. I'm not a financial expert but I do know that its a crap shoot to invest in stocks. CD's aren't paying much. Its the same story your telling about finding whats "hot". AND at the end of the day the watches don't disappear when the stock market bell rings. |
17 September 2009, 09:40 AM | #126 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,415
|
I personally like all of my watches and really dont care if there isnt a market in the future for them.I bought all of them to wear and enjoy with disposable income.Having been in the investment world all of my adult life I can tell you from my experience nobody has a consistent long term crystal ball.Who knows what the market will bring for them.Life is really too short to keep chasing $ and % returns. I traded next to a 80+ year old for years that made millions daily and I dont think he ever enjoyed anything in life other than the thrill of making money.He died and his kids spent it like he could never have imagined.Wear them and enjoy them or stash them away and count the paper returns on them.I personally love buying Vintage watches that where sitting in a safe deposit box.Some guys preserve things for the next lucky guy.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
17 September 2009, 12:13 PM | #127 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Quote:
__________________
__________________ |
|
17 September 2009, 01:37 PM | #128 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: David
Location: Sandy Springs, Ga
Watch: GMT II, new Subbie
Posts: 937
|
|
17 September 2009, 01:57 PM | #129 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: KADEN
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
This year has been fantastic for me while all of my friends want to hang themselves...I expect the next few years to be even more of the same. Dollar crash is eminent |
|
17 September 2009, 02:01 PM | #130 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: KADEN
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
W-serial Submariner Date - $2650.00 U-serial Submariner No date - $2400.00 7,xxx,xxx Diamond Bezel Datejust - $1500.00 I'm pretty sure I can get the return I paid on these watches anytime I want in the next 10 years, while in the meantime I wear and Enjoy the hell out of them. Sounds like a good "investment" to me personally... |
|
17 September 2009, 02:13 PM | #131 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Bill Hart
Location: Richmond, NY, UK
Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3
Posts: 3,053
|
I have 5 Rolex watches...I bought my first SS DJ in 1986, then another one in 1988, then a DD with diamond dial in 2002, then a GMT IIc early this year, then finally an Explorer II last week....I am more than sure I can get at least what I paid for all of them.......I wear them all....LOTS and for everything.....I have worn a Rolex from this collection every day of half my life (I am 46 next month)......my enjoyment could be considered as the profit in my opinion....so if I can always get back what I initially paid that's great......there are very few things in this world you can enjoy daily for half your life and then get back what you paid if you decide to sell.......I don't see them as investments but hell....they are certainly good value!!!!!
__________________
Bill "There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't" TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron |
17 September 2009, 07:40 PM | #132 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,633
|
How come we don't hear from the people that their watches are worth less then they paid for them? Funny, isn't it? LOL!
__________________
Adam |
18 September 2009, 11:55 PM | #133 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Herbert Frank
Location: Middletown,De
Watch: President
Posts: 1,641
|
Replacement Value
Quote:
__________________
Time and Tide wait for no man Rolex Cellini 4133 Tudor North Flag HERS: Rolex TTDJ |
|
18 September 2009, 11:59 PM | #134 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Herbert Frank
Location: Middletown,De
Watch: President
Posts: 1,641
|
Insurance
Quote:
__________________
Time and Tide wait for no man Rolex Cellini 4133 Tudor North Flag HERS: Rolex TTDJ |
|
19 September 2009, 11:12 AM | #135 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Austin
Location: Willis, Tx.
Watch: 18238 YG
Posts: 67
|
In a market that has lost me hundreds of thousands in the last year, buying a Sub and a Day-Date this year on the way back up made me feel like at least I was getting something for my money.
__________________
AustinMc ref. 16610 SS Date Submariner A ref. 18238 YG Day-Date President T ref. 16234 SS Datejust S |
19 September 2009, 01:03 PM | #136 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: S.F. Peninsula
Watch: what you say!
Posts: 815
|
|
25 January 2010, 08:01 AM | #137 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aspen, CO
Watch: Swatch KikiPicasso
Posts: 266
|
Now that we've had a crash in the world stock markets, and folks see that the returns of the US stock markets for the last decade are negative, I wonder about stocks as an "investment". I think they are good trades. Indeed, the US stock markets haven't kept up with inflation - inflation adjustment makes them worse. A Rolex has something you want in an investment - LIQUIDITY. My home isn't liquid. I can't carry it on my wrist. Had I bought a Comex twenty years ago?
|
25 January 2010, 08:12 AM | #138 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Richard
Location: Macungie, PA
Watch: 5513 Sub, LV Sub
Posts: 14,494
|
Bought my 5513 Submariner new back in 1978 for $650.
Can't image what it is worth today. Been wearing it for over 30 years - that's the best part!
__________________
"Few things in life give man as great a pleasure as wearing a Rolex!" TRF's "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron |
25 January 2010, 08:14 AM | #139 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
|
..
|
25 January 2010, 08:31 AM | #140 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Pete
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,593
|
I will start this by admitting that I tired before I could read all of the 7 pages of posts...
My two cents, which may be worth less than the future value of two cents based on current earnings ratios... sorry, I was trying to fit in :-) I brought my first Rolex, SS Sub in 2001 - I have been offered more than I paid for it as a trade in from two AD's - to me, that's a good deal. There are not many things that I bought in 2001 that are worth more today, or that have been on my wrist every day for 8 years! Second thing that I had to vent about - people on here will pick and choose a particular stock "if you bough Microsoft or Apple back then, it would be worth... ". You can do this for anything - my argument is that most of the market isn't up and we learned last year how quickly some things and people out of your control can ruin your investment. I am happy with my SS Sub vs. any of my dot.com stocks that aren't worth the paper they are printed on. I would say normally that housing is a great investment - but look what's happened to the market the past 20 months, there are people's lives literally crumbling because of the market and the speculators trying to get rich quick. My Rolexes could be worth nothing tomorrow and my life won't be in tathers. Either way... Rolexes, not true investments, okay. An item that I am passionate about, I find beautiful both aesthetically and from a technological point of view, and while I may not retire on my collections, it certainly should hold enough value that I won't regret owning them. Last point - I have never seen a forum where people spend hours of their time photographing and posting pictures of their stock portfolio :-). -Pete
__________________
SS Submariner K16610 SS Submariner F16610LV SS/P Yachtmaster M16622 SS Black Dial Daytona M116520 SS Explorer II D16570 |
25 January 2010, 08:32 AM | #141 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
No investment, unless you want to wait 20, 30 years!
|
25 January 2010, 08:42 AM | #142 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I don't think of Rolex as an investment, but more of an asset that does hold most of it's value of time.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
23 March 2010, 06:59 AM | #143 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
I also beleive the Rolex will hold its value better than the papper dollars(FRN) they print everyday at the federal reserve bank. I beleive this is why rich folks buy hard assets, art, rolex, gold, silver, all hold value better than the dollar bill will. |
|
23 March 2010, 03:51 PM | #144 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Singapore
Watch: out kiddo!
Posts: 1,033
|
Quote:
Its an exotic class of investment and I wouldnt put all money on the table that its an investment per se. There are lots of better investments that is able to churn better returns (except for the super rare Rolex vintage models that have appreciated exponentially) IMHO, 1st condition to buy it as a pleasure / reward / self actualisation and 2nd condition - price appreciation or stability. Remember to include inflation costs to the price and opportunity costs of putting your money elsewhere. Its not that simple to put a tab that Rolex watches will make you money.
__________________
Viva La Rolex |
|
23 March 2010, 04:59 PM | #145 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko
Posts: 1,562
|
rolex as an investment? never
but knowing it holds its value pretty well is always settling
__________________
https://www.instagram.com/invites/co...ontent=5yeough |
26 March 2010, 04:14 AM | #146 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Richmond, KY
Watch: SS Sub, PAM 111
Posts: 67
|
I bought my SS Submariner in 2003 for (new) $3800, its replacement value from the same dealer is now $5750!
I bought the watch as it is a beautifully crafted machine, it certainly is not losing value. |
26 March 2010, 04:23 AM | #147 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
|
I don't consider it an investment.
I just value a Rolex as a fine timepiece that I love to wear! If it does do up in value, it would just be icing on the cake but not what I look for in a watch.
__________________
Member Number 34171 "Remember: No matter where you go... there you are." Buckroo Banzai _________________________________________ |
26 March 2010, 04:25 AM | #148 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
+1
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
26 March 2010, 04:29 AM | #149 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston USA
Watch: BLRO Jubilee
Posts: 1,777
|
"I buy my watches to enjoy, if they happen to go up in value over time that is just a bonus."
There you go That is exactly what I believe too. But one thing in particular about Rolex is that - If I am crazy for fine swiss timepieces instead of buying a Breitling, Tag etc. (which are fine timepieces) I would rather spend the money on a Rolex which I am sure will hold its value (if not increase) far better than the others.
__________________
Rest in peace JJ! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani "Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly" |
26 March 2010, 04:40 AM | #150 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: the neighbourhood
Watch: 1680 Red
Posts: 2,262
|
always wanted an SS Sub Date & when able to i went i bought one, didn't see it so much as an investment, more like i could wear it & if times got tough i'd hopefully not lose out...
__________________
SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.