ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

gironawatch · 18 January 2015, 11:27 PM

hello
what we think about this, for me it look fake 100%

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTYwMFgxNjAw/z/0y0AAOSwxYxUsq7n/$_57.JPG

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTYwMFgxMjAw/z/2CQAAOSw2s1Usq7A/$_57.JPG

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTYwMFgxNjAw/z/vtkAAOSw8d9Usq7R/$_57.JPG

fmc000 · 19 January 2015, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gironawatch

hello
what we think about this, for me it look fake 100%

Photos inline.

mdw3 · 19 January 2015, 05:30 AM

Fake-o-rama. Falso. Fugazi. Any other questions?

GeoGio Greece · 19 January 2015, 06:10 AM

Very same watch a couple of posts before, headed / titled 6263

AS1 · 19 January 2015, 06:26 AM

what a horrible dial!

rozyd · 19 January 2015, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeoGio Greece

Very same watch a couple of posts before, headed / titled 6263

Same user too.

Michael M. · 19 January 2015, 10:58 AM

Complete fake, and a quite poor one at that.

AzHadEnuf · 20 January 2015, 01:00 PM

Newer member to the forum. I have had a couple of Rolexs for many years. One from my Dad and one I bought from an AD 20 years ago. I have learned so much from you guys over the last few months on TRF. What scares me is that I can never spot the fakes and rarely do the posters state what's wrong with the fake much beyond, "Bad watch/dial/movement Run"! The one thing I've learned is don't buy a watch before posting it here. Is there a reason that more detail is not given as to what the tip off of the fake is?

iclick · 20 January 2015, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzHadEnuf

Is there a reason that more detail is not given as to what the tip off of the fake is?

I think the rationale for some is that by divulging the errors the fakers can use that info to make better fakes.

18 January 2015, 11:27 PM	#1
gironawatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: london Posts: 27	rolex daytona 6263 hello what we think about this, for me it look fake 100% http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTYwMFgxNjAw/z/0y0AAOSwxYxUsq7n/$_57.JPG http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTYwMFgxMjAw/z/2CQAAOSw2s1Usq7A/$_57.JPG http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/MTYwMFgxNjAw/z/vtkAAOSw8d9Usq7R/$_57.JPG

19 January 2015, 06:10 AM	#4
GeoGio Greece "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: George Location: Athens, Greece Watch: es --> A lot ! Posts: 2,327	Very same watch a couple of posts before, headed / titled 6263 __________________ Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones. DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series

19 January 2015, 05:30 AM	#3
mdw3 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 677	Fake-o-rama. Falso. Fugazi. Any other questions?

19 January 2015, 06:26 AM	#5
AS1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: NYC / Milan Watch: 6263 Posts: 3,938	what a horrible dial!

19 January 2015, 10:58 AM	#7
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Complete fake, and a quite poor one at that.

20 January 2015, 01:00 PM	#8
AzHadEnuf "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Ralph Location: Tucson, Arizona Watch: 6263,DJ,SUB,BB,THR Posts: 2,043	Newer member to the forum. I have had a couple of Rolexs for many years. One from my Dad and one I bought from an AD 20 years ago. I have learned so much from you guys over the last few months on TRF. What scares me is that I can never spot the fakes and rarely do the posters state what's wrong with the fake much beyond, "Bad watch/dial/movement Run"! The one thing I've learned is don't buy a watch before posting it here. Is there a reason that more detail is not given as to what the tip off of the fake is?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)