ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 January 2017, 02:59 AM | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Quote:
Also, Aaron, I found it interesting how you noted that Red Submariners seem to be much more plentiful than Whites. I have for a long time believed the same. It's much more difficult to find a crisp untouched 1680 White than a 1680 Red. |
|
22 January 2017, 03:22 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: City of Angels
Watch: $500 Tourbillon
Posts: 109
|
Im new here so please take my suggestion lightly.
Between the two, id go 1655 assuming you already have a sub in your collection and plus the "floating hands" on the 1655 is something i always drooled over. If you dont have a sub then. Well all of us needs at least one in the collection right? |
22 January 2017, 03:40 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,419
|
I'll speak for the (perhaps minority) of Sub fans who simply don't find the 1655 appealing in any way. To me they look like a prop from the 1970s version of Battlestar Galactica.
|
22 January 2017, 03:56 AM | #34 | ||||
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,509
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm sitting on the side of the fence that's bending heavily towards a 1655 right now. I've found a very nice example with a very well known TRF vintage seller. |
||||
22 January 2017, 04:18 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
Get the one you prefer. You said you'll get both in the end anyway, so it doesn't really matter.
Seems like you're leaning on the side of the 1655 already, so... I prefer RED 1680, but that doesn't matter to you. That aside - the SUB was, is, and always will be, more popular.
__________________
|
22 January 2017, 04:53 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Niels Pedersen
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 57
|
I'd go with the 1655 all day, every day. I love a good Red Sub, but my favourite vintage SS Rolex will always be a 1655, so that makes my choice.
|
22 January 2017, 08:31 AM | #37 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,792
|
Quote:
|
|
22 January 2017, 01:50 PM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,507
|
whichever speaks to you more...
|
22 January 2017, 03:30 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
1655 all day every day
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 January 2017, 03:30 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
|
22 January 2017, 05:09 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Donald
Location: Australia
Posts: 973
|
I'd be picking a great 1655, 1680 Reds are more readily available IMO.
Both great watches for sure. |
22 January 2017, 10:45 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 609
|
Can't go wrong either way but I'd go red sub all the way. In my opinion is that while both pieces look great in pictures the red sub has got way more wrist presence in real life :)
|
22 January 2017, 11:16 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
Agree. Best advice. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Member of Nylon Nation
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.