ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Ruud Van Driver · 29 October 2016, 09:57 PM

I poked my nose into the OP boutique today. Haven't been in for about six weeks so it was rude not to.

The manager brought out a 578 to show me.

O.

M.

G.

Check out the tourbillon at the ten o'clock position

No Cru, I didn't

1William · 29 October 2016, 10:12 PM

Beautiful. How much?

Ruud Van Driver · 29 October 2016, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1William

Beautiful. How much?

S$ 205,000, which is about GB£ 121,000 / US$ 147,500

Ian Macdermott · 30 October 2016, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver

S$ 205,000, which is about GB£ 121,000 / US$ 147,500

Your next Pam Paul

I was going to buy one but it's only water resistant to 100 metres.

fullcourt · 30 October 2016, 12:12 AM

beautiful....

Ruud Van Driver · 30 October 2016, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian Macdermott

Your next Pam Paul

I was going to buy one but it's only water resistant to 100 metres.

I wish I could afford to consider it on interest free over ten years, Ian!

It really is a sight to behold. The tourbillon movement is amazing, it was mesmerising watching that thingy do its thing.

nick c · 30 October 2016, 12:16 AM

Crazy watch wowww take it home Paul

Ian Macdermott · 30 October 2016, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver

I wish I could afford to consider it on interest free over ten years, Ian!

It really is a sight to behold. The tourbillon movement is amazing, it was mesmerising watching that thingy do its thing.

£1008 a month

It looks amazing and I suspect much better in the flesh. Now I just need to win the Euro millions lotto tonight.

gav329 · 30 October 2016, 12:45 AM

It's a fabulous piece of engineering but I will stick to looking at a 560 perhaps, I just love the simplicity of it compared to the complexity of this one. However it's stunning none the less!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ap1 · 30 October 2016, 12:53 AM

I think thingy should be in the horology dictionary. That piece is sick! Thanks for sharing.

Ruud Van Driver · 30 October 2016, 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick c

Crazy watch wowww take it home Paul

I didn't even touch it Nick, never mind take it home! It was already sold so I didn't ask to try it on as a courtesy to the owner. At that price, I didn't want to handle it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian Macdermott

£1008 a month

It looks amazing and I suspect much better in the flesh. Now I just need to win the Euro millions lotto tonight.

Maybe 25 years would be more realistic

Quote:

Originally Posted by ap1

I think thingy should be in the horology dictionary. That piece is sick! Thanks for sharing.

'Thingy' is such a cool and versatile word. Try it, you'll see what I mean

mps354 · 30 October 2016, 03:04 AM

Very impressive

Cru Jones · 30 October 2016, 04:44 AM

Wow, that would look AMAZING with the 689 and 359!!

(

I can't help trying.... Thanks for the pics!)

Psmith · 30 October 2016, 06:22 AM

Very nice Paul. I breezed into the Harrods Panerai mini-boutique last weekend, but no such exotica on display.

1st amg · 30 October 2016, 10:30 PM

Holy, that's an impressive piece....lots of cash though.

ajas · 25 November 2016, 04:51 PM

Looks great indeed.

Had a chance to try the same model when I dropped my 162 for quick SPA before holidays.

It is really amazing.

Now need to work harder and save more £££

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

30 October 2016, 12:12 AM	#5
fullcourt "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: dp Location: chicago, usa Watch: panerai Posts: 2,369	beautiful.... __________________ dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG

30 October 2016, 06:22 AM	#14
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Very nice Paul. I breezed into the Harrods Panerai mini-boutique last weekend, but no such exotica on display. __________________

29 October 2016, 10:12 PM	#2
1William 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 44,749	Beautiful. How much?

30 October 2016, 12:16 AM	#7
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Crazy watch wowww take it home Paul

30 October 2016, 12:45 AM	#9
gav329 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Scotland Posts: 355	It's a fabulous piece of engineering but I will stick to looking at a 560 perhaps, I just love the simplicity of it compared to the complexity of this one. However it's stunning none the less! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 October 2016, 12:53 AM	#10
ap1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,042	I think thingy should be in the horology dictionary. That piece is sick! Thanks for sharing.

30 October 2016, 03:04 AM	#12
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 8,972	Very impressive

30 October 2016, 04:44 AM	#13
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,499	Wow, that would look AMAZING with the 689 and 359!! ( I can't help trying.... Thanks for the pics!)

30 October 2016, 10:30 PM	#15
1st amg 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: nicholas Location: ottawa canada Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai Posts: 9,476	Holy, that's an impressive piece....lots of cash though.

25 November 2016, 04:51 PM	#16
ajas "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Will Location: Kuala Lumpur Watch: SubC, Pam, Speede Posts: 3,140	Looks great indeed. Had a chance to try the same model when I dropped my 162 for quick SPA before holidays. It is really amazing. Now need to work harder and save more £££ Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)