ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Foxiness · 3 July 2017, 10:50 PM

Should I bite on the 389 or wait for the 1389?

Can't decide because the 389 is a bit too thick

nick c · 3 July 2017, 11:19 PM

For the thinner case go 1389.

Cru Jones · 4 July 2017, 03:16 AM

1389 for me: I like the blue hand for the submersibles, plus the thinner case is a plus. I also think the solid case back makes more sense for an "anti magnetic" model.

ap1 · 4 July 2017, 05:01 AM

Thinner is better, four digits in a blowout

3 July 2017, 10:50 PM	#1
Foxiness "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Ny Posts: 217	PAM 389 or 1389 Should I bite on the 389 or wait for the 1389? Can't decide because the 389 is a bit too thick

3 July 2017, 11:19 PM	#2
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	For the thinner case go 1389.

4 July 2017, 03:16 AM	#3
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,475	1389 for me: I like the blue hand for the submersibles, plus the thinner case is a plus. I also think the solid case back makes more sense for an "anti magnetic" model.

4 July 2017, 05:01 AM	#4
ap1 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,036	Thinner is better, four digits in a blowout

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)