The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 July 2016, 12:00 AM   #1
ncmoto
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Ken Lloyds
Location: USA
Posts: 15
Is this clasp real?

Ive had this in a bag of extra stuff and would like to know if anyone can tell if its real THAMKS Ken






I think from the 80s
ncmoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 03:14 AM   #2
southtexas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,697
Is this clasp real?

The clasp and blades look good to me, but the diver extension is questionable. I believe the scroll work up at coronet should have the hooks one above and one below the opposing line (hope that makes sense).

Here's a pic of mine for comparison (I bracelet code).

Let's see what others think......





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 06:12 AM   #3
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,165
Dont like that divers extension


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 12:16 PM   #4
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,813
Someone was questioning the validity of these early 93150 bracelets recently. I think calling them "transitional" is not a stretch. This other member thought they were put together using 9315 clasp covers with 93150 blades inside. Anyway, they are real and the OP has shown one.

I am currently selling a "study in over polishing" right now on eBay. It also has been "tightened" by gnawing on the hinge areas of the blades. Anyway, I'm trying to see the divers extension engraving because the OP one looks ok (or at least not phony) to me and the later photo looks to be of a later 93150 bracelet with the thicker clasp cover and two rows of holes in the side rather than one.

I'll attach what I have and see if I can see anything. Mine is 1980 with a VE code. I zoomed in with the iPhone photo editor on the extension engraving. I think it looks similar to the OP...
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg image.jpeg (69.9 KB, 152 views)
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2016, 12:30 PM   #5
southtexas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,697
The 9315 clasps don't have a thumb recess.

Your diver extension has different scroll work than the OP.
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 09:52 AM   #6
southtexas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,697
Is this clasp real?

Edited

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2016, 11:55 PM   #7
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by southtexas View Post

Your diver extension has different scroll work than the OP.
You think so? I know it's a bad photo but I think they look pretty similar.

Here is an X12 code extension.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (61.5 KB, 97 views)
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 12:24 AM   #8
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by J!m View Post
You think so? I know it's a bad photo but I think they look pretty similar.

Here is an X12 code extension.
Look closer and you'll se that they don't look the same.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2016, 10:37 AM   #9
southtexas
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by J!m View Post
You think so? I know it's a bad photo but I think they look pretty similar.



Here is an X12 code extension.


Yes that one looks like the one you previously posted, and the one I posted. However, those all look different than the OP. Please re-read my first post; I tried to explain what is the difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.