ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

alexxelor · 13 October 2013, 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wesleyvs

So if you had to choose .. Wich one would you take ? Think we all know wich one will be the favorite but i'm still curious to see what the opinions will be from everyone.

Cheers

under the same conditions definitely prefer the old model but looks good vintage paul newman two colors, the case is polished and therefore would no doubt choose the new model . then this is already history, the first daytona platinum.

ninotcs · 13 October 2013, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexxelor

under the same conditions definitely prefer the old model but looks good vintage paul newman two colors, the case is polished and therefore would no doubt choose the new model . then this is already history, the first daytona platinum.

They are both super ugly

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

HL65 · 13 October 2013, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninotcs

They are both super ugly

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

alexxelor · 13 October 2013, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninotcs

They are both super ugly

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

maybe it was better with the bezel in platinum

i don't like the caramic .

madkimchee · 13 October 2013, 06:54 AM

PN for sure.

lig · 13 October 2013, 06:57 AM

PN although the Platinum is growing on me...

MisterStefan · 13 October 2013, 07:01 AM

PN, easy. But the new Daytona is a real beauty!

Passionata · 13 October 2013, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexxelor

maybe it was better with the bezel in platinum

i don't like the caramic .

exactly

KingDaytona101 · 19 October 2013, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wesleyvs

So if you had to choose .. Wich one would you take ? Think we all know wich one will be the favorite but i'm still curious to see what the opinions will be from everyone.

Cheers

Is that even a question? PN of course!

Baselman · 19 October 2013, 09:05 PM

On the platinum if they had done all brown subdials with the Paul Newman style subdial markings, a brown outer ring on the dial and a slightly domed sapphire crystal then the platinum daytona would have been a nod to the past but a new direction for future and would have been a clear winner even dare I say it over the older Paul Newman - but Rolex year after year continually dissapoint and cannot get into their heads to use great design over shiny shiny sparkly sparkly design on all their watches - but it's what we all have come to expect from Rolex - sorry for the rant but Rolex need to up their design and creativity.

mjclark32 · 19 October 2013, 09:24 PM

I'm over here with Sam

Michael M. · 20 October 2013, 01:18 AM

Pn..

kieselguhr · 20 October 2013, 02:28 AM

Saw the platinum at the Wynn the other day. Its drop dead gorgeous with an equally deadly price tag.

If we were going on just the qualities of both watches and price was a non factor. PT

Passionata · 20 October 2013, 03:52 AM

In Europe with 15-20percent discount avaliable
these days
Best
George

Sent from my iPad using

datejusting · 20 October 2013, 10:00 AM

Pn

pininfarina · 23 October 2013, 01:52 AM

PN for me for sure!

Actually, your question sounded like they are free to everyone... which one will you take? Haha...

But it's a good comparison and i respect your research.

GB-man · 23 October 2013, 02:24 AM

PN merely because I would keep it at my home as art. I am not a daytona fan so I am not burning to put either on my wrist.

hennabav · 23 October 2013, 05:12 AM

PN no doubt....I'm not a fan of the PT anyways ;-)

HauteHorlogerie · 23 October 2013, 05:34 AM

I actually don't like the PN....I like the 6263 non PN big red....so PT in this case, after seeing the PT in person and wearing my 6263 non PN last week at my local AD I know that's where I stand.

tkerrmd · 23 October 2013, 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Not much of a vintage guy and I love heavy metals so platinum for me.

+1 we have very similar tastes Mike

19 October 2013, 09:24 PM	#71
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I'm over here with Sam __________________

20 October 2013, 03:52 AM	#74
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	In Europe with 15-20percent discount avaliable these days Best George Sent from my iPad using __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

13 October 2013, 06:54 AM	#65
madkimchee "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Mike Location: California Posts: 79	PN for sure.

13 October 2013, 06:57 AM	#66
lig "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: PacNW Watch: Enthusiast Posts: 2,603	PN although the Platinum is growing on me...

13 October 2013, 07:01 AM	#67
MisterStefan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: - Posts: 290	PN, easy. But the new Daytona is a real beauty!

19 October 2013, 09:05 PM	#70
Baselman "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Switzerland Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD Posts: 1,527	On the platinum if they had done all brown subdials with the Paul Newman style subdial markings, a brown outer ring on the dial and a slightly domed sapphire crystal then the platinum daytona would have been a nod to the past but a new direction for future and would have been a clear winner even dare I say it over the older Paul Newman - but Rolex year after year continually dissapoint and cannot get into their heads to use great design over shiny shiny sparkly sparkly design on all their watches - but it's what we all have come to expect from Rolex - sorry for the rant but Rolex need to up their design and creativity.

20 October 2013, 01:18 AM	#72
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Pn..

20 October 2013, 02:28 AM	#73
kieselguhr "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Nick Location: Las Vegas Watch: 1601 Posts: 10,413	Saw the platinum at the Wynn the other day. Its drop dead gorgeous with an equally deadly price tag. If we were going on just the qualities of both watches and price was a non factor. PT

20 October 2013, 10:00 AM	#75
datejusting "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Al Location: USA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,153	Pn

23 October 2013, 01:52 AM	#76
pininfarina "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Pin Location: singapore Posts: 44	PN for me for sure! Actually, your question sounded like they are free to everyone... which one will you take? Haha... But it's a good comparison and i respect your research.

23 October 2013, 02:24 AM	#77
GB-man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 36,852	PN merely because I would keep it at my home as art. I am not a daytona fan so I am not burning to put either on my wrist.

23 October 2013, 05:12 AM	#78
hennabav Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jon Location: New England Watch: --Rolex-- Posts: 2,391	PN no doubt....I'm not a fan of the PT anyways ;-)

23 October 2013, 05:34 AM	#79
HauteHorlogerie Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: My house Watch: 519LN \| 64A Posts: 1,241	I actually don't like the PN....I like the 6263 non PN big red....so PT in this case, after seeing the PT in person and wearing my 6263 non PN last week at my local AD I know that's where I stand.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)