ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
2 October 2009, 05:57 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
|
All F's will have NO lug holes.
I see your post reference the saga, JJ, and was not aware that Rolex differentiated their cases between a date watch and a non-date watch.
__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established. |
2 October 2009, 06:02 AM | #2 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
Only recently, they gave it a COSC rating and the ROLEX inscription around the rehaut ring. Other than that, no changes at all. Except for this model, all F's come with NO lug holes. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
2 October 2009, 08:13 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
|
|
2 October 2009, 02:29 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,695
|
Spot on my friend. The 14060M, COSC or not ,is the last of a breed. Lug holes and of course the old style 93150 bracelet with the old style diver's extention.
Nice Sub Mike.... I thought about the no date or Seadweller for a long time...Love my classic, but may have to get one of these some day. After my GMT Coke and maybe one other flavor. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.