ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 April 2008, 08:15 AM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 134
|
Should I get it regulated, accept it, or flip it? It is absolutely beautiful.
|
2 April 2008, 08:17 AM | #32 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
2 April 2008, 08:31 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Ten watches; four wives; many childern and I have no idea how they work! I am glad I have them and love them all.
|
2 April 2008, 08:32 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
.
Last edited by redshirt1957; 2 April 2008 at 08:45 AM.. Reason: Double Post! |
2 April 2008, 08:37 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
|
That is out of spec, might need to be regulated, though from what I understand, if a watch runs consistently slow or fast, there may be absolutely nothing wrong with it.
The real sign of trouble is when it starts behaving erratically: -10 one day, + then the next etc..... |
2 April 2008, 08:42 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
I'd hold off on doing anything just yet. My GMT IIc started off -6+ seconds a day and has now settled in at -3.5 seconds a day. If after a couple of months it still is not within spec, I'd bring it to a Rolex Service Center and have them regulate it.
|
3 April 2008, 07:57 AM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 134
|
pretty rare
I don't think that what has happened to you happens that much. Such a big difference after the break in.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.