ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Sub or Exp?? | |||
Keep the Sub-C! | 238 | 55.09% | |
Go for the Exp II 42, you will love it!! | 194 | 44.91% | |
Voters: 432. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14 September 2012, 11:41 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I've tried on both and my choice was the SubC. Well actually it was the SubC LV.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
14 September 2012, 11:43 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,425
|
Quote:
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
|
14 September 2012, 11:47 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SF
Posts: 242
|
The very first Rolex I wanted was a Sub. I was finally in the market for one and I found TRF. After doing some reading and shopping I saw some EX2 images and damn... never could I've imagine that I would fall in love at first sight.
|
15 September 2012, 01:26 PM | #64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Quote:
|
|
16 September 2012, 10:45 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
|
Guys put a deposit on the Exp II... once I sell my 16710 Pepsi... it will be mine!!!
|
16 September 2012, 10:51 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Thanks guys Quote:
Congrats Sol
__________________
|
|
16 September 2012, 11:36 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 208
|
One more for keeping the Sub-C.
|
23 September 2012, 06:46 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,594
|
I've always thought my next purchase was going to be a SubC
But this weekend I went to try the GMT Master II and I loved it. Have u tried it?? |
24 September 2012, 01:07 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I would get both!
|
24 September 2012, 01:27 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Keep the sub.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
24 September 2012, 01:30 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Jim
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,067
|
I never tell anyone what to do after all its your money and your wrist. But it sounds to me that you're not digging the SubC but on the other hand you're not totally sold on the exp II either. Maybe wait awhile until you can make a more clear cut decision.
Don't listen to what you hear about resale value or what movement someone claims to be better than the other, that's just hogwash IMO. Either watch will perform wonderfully and bring you years of enjoyment if cared for properly. Get what you like best and are comfortable with. Good luck! |
24 September 2012, 01:33 AM | #72 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: indonesia
Posts: 43
|
even though i own the new exp 2 42mm. i would say keep the subc.
subc is on my "next" list.... |
24 September 2012, 01:47 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
|
I got the Exp II Black.
I said if I don't like it I can always flip it and get another Sub-C. It is a fantastic watch thus far but did not have much time to play with it. The size is not bad at all, it fits very nicely. I will post up an "incoming" thread tomorrow hopefully. |
29 October 2012, 04:18 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Rick
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3
|
I have been on the fence with both the EXP II and the Sub for over 6 months now. I finally pulled the trigger and purchased the Sub this weekend because of its strong history (peer pressure). I spent the weekend with the Sub and all I can think about is the EXP II. The black dial exp ii is just an amazing timepiece and really sings! The sub is a stunning watch and there is a reason it is so popular, but there is just something very magical about the EXP II. I'm heading to the AD tomorrow and see I can possibly make an exchange. I would strongly suggest you get what you really love and put little stock in others opinion. I listened to people who love their subs, but ultimately made the wrong decision.
|
29 October 2012, 04:23 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: East Midlands, UK
Watch: Patek and Rolex
Posts: 1,074
|
If you had got the ExpII, would you have been thinking about the sub? Human nature, wanting what we haven't got? I own both and love them equally. Good luck with the exchange
|
29 October 2012, 11:49 PM | #76 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC, Daytona
Posts: 588
|
You won't know for sure until you take the plunge. I had a SubC/gmtC dilemma earlier this year. Bought the GMT first and after a month knew that I should have gotten the sub and went for it. And later thought a polar ex42 would be a great compliment to the subC. Forced to pick only one? I'd pick the subC as i feel i can dress it slightly up or down. The explorer is for me to go with casual attire. There's really no right or wrong as it really depends on your lifestyle or preference. I have small wrists and the slightly smaller sub fits me better overall. Good luck
|
30 October 2012, 04:17 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New York
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,138
|
Get the one that is the most "magical" like you said. For me the orange hands and ss bezel were a no go, but others love those features. I prefer the exp. 1 over the exp. 2. But I really love the red hands on the older exp. 2.
Each model is going to speak to different people in different ways. Subs are always going to win polls, more votes because they speak to more people. |
30 October 2012, 10:05 AM | #78 |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Dennis
Location: GMT -5
Watch: 116710
Posts: 102
|
Explorer II for sure!
|
30 October 2012, 01:43 PM | #79 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,035
|
I also had the same dilemma. I tried on both months ago. Every time I looked at the SubC I kept saying I want something different than everyone else. So I went with the Exp II first. No regrets. I will never ever flip or sale that watch. It's my favorite. Very comfortable to wear and looks amazing. Then as the months past by I started thinking of the SubC. Constantly. Since I knew I would never sale or flip my Exp II. I eventually added the SubC. If you can't do two at one time which I couldn't either. Get Explorer first. Then try like hell to add the SubC later. Here are some of my pics.ImageUploadedByTapatalk1351568540.939848.jpgImageUploadedByTapatalk1351568582.062016.jpgImageUploadedByTapatalk1351568598.782084.jpgImageUploadedByTapatalk1351568611.724290.jpg
__________________
Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask |
31 October 2012, 12:10 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Canada
Watch: Polar Explorer II
Posts: 1,231
|
Depends what you're doing with the watch. Personally I wouldn't buy anything based on its resale value, but for the value it gives me.
I got the Explorer II because it kind of flies under the radar, the hands are bigger so that I can more easily read it, and because I tend to get into places where there is a lot of dust and sand and crap and a rotating bezel would be a dust and sand magnet. I don't scuba dive so I don't really need the rotating bezel. Plus the Explorer II (Polar 216570) looks really nice with a suit. It's a very versatile. |
31 October 2012, 12:19 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
Keep the Sub
|
31 October 2012, 01:18 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,900
|
Even though i have a TT Blue SubC i do have a leaning towards GMT's and Explorers having a two time zone feature or three time zones in some cases. Both have features that make a good watch,difficult decision. As said there is no bad choice.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
31 October 2012, 01:45 AM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
keep the Sub
|
1 November 2012, 09:14 PM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 482
|
Sub C
__________________
My Collection: -Rolex White SS Daytona -Rolex Submariner no-date -Omega Speedmaster Moon Watch -Omega Seamaster Professional |
5 November 2012, 02:53 AM | #85 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
|
Subc.
|
5 November 2012, 04:05 AM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Big Al
Location: Canada
Watch: the next one
Posts: 153
|
Good thread.
For me the Explorer 11 is one cool watch. As has been said - everybody seems to have a Sub nowadays & the Sub C looks way to boxey & shiny! The Explorer 11 is more individual & unique - not as common. |
5 November 2012, 04:34 AM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 445
|
I voted Sub C. It is a gorgeous looking watch and the clasp is an amazing piece of work. Just like a Beemer 3 series, there are lots of reasons why it is so popular. However, a white dial Explorer 11 also looks incredible. Personally, I will keep the Sub and save up for the Explorer!
|
13 November 2012, 04:18 AM | #88 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,810
|
Interesting perspectives indeed. I have both a GMT-C and the Explorer II. I see the GMT and the Sub as being very similar with respects to the dial and readability. I do like the rotating bezel of the Sub-C; very smooth. I do appreciate the rotating bezel of the GMT that the Explorer II does not have, but it is just a small drawback. I would second all the points made about the Explorer II. The Expy II is my daily wearer and the face is the easiest to read of all the Rolexes I have owned (16710, 16610, DateJust, TOG, SeaDweller). What pulls me to the Explorer II over my GMT-C (and for the Sub if I had owned it) is the black matte face, and the understated bezel. The Explorer II looks different from all the other Rolexes, especially the Ceramic ones, is only available in stainless (no gold, platinum variants), and has the easiest to read dial in day and night. The orange in the 24 hour hand makes this watch unmistakable with any other model. I too was reticent of the TwinLoc crown after wearing the GMT-C as my daily wearer for five years, but it is the largest of the TwinLoc crowns (same as used on the Milgauss). As an added option, I purchased separately from the sales forum a Sub-C glidelock clasp. I like the larger clasp cover and the ability to adjust for when I wear the watch outside of long sleeve thermal t-shirts (skiing, cycling). The half-link on the Exp II is usable, but the Glidelock adds functionality that only Rolex can. I'd go Explorer II... -Sheldon
__________________
|
13 November 2012, 11:55 PM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
|
Both are beauties - was toying with both and then decided on the Explorer 2 (black face) - delighted with it -go for it - you wont regret it.
|
14 November 2012, 10:29 AM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,594
|
I voted for the SubC...I actually just picked one up last week
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.