ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 November 2014, 06:01 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SoCal & Jakarta
Watch: ROLEX, AP, and PP
Posts: 916
|
Ceramic, I have the SS version currently
|
1 November 2014, 07:37 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
|
Quote:
That being said, if you plan on keeping the GMT, maybe the ceramic would give you a good change of pace. Ideally, I would buy the SS, and take the difference in cost, flip the GMT, for something in GOLD, haha |
|
1 November 2014, 09:37 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: B
Location: UK
Posts: 976
|
I voted for SS with my wallet- love it!!
__________________
Current: 1: Rolex DSSD M 2008 2: Rolex Day-Date 40 YG White Dial Random 2018 3:Panerai Luminor Submersible Titanium PAM 25 2013 P Previous:[/B] 1: Rolex 16610 Y 2002 2: Rolex Daytona V 2008 3: Rolex 16610LV Z 2007 4: Rolex Milgauss 116400GV V 2008 5: Panerai Luminor Marina PR PAM 93 2005 6: AP ROO Diver H 2013 7: Rolex DJ II Slate w/ Grn Romans Random 2013 8:Panerai Submersible Ti PAM 25 2013 |
2 November 2014, 02:07 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,676
|
I like SS better, but I think the Ceramic matches better your BLNR.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein |
7 November 2014, 08:13 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
I used to have a SS diver....
They are beautiful but very easy the scratch the bezel due to its thickness! So I would go Ceramic !
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
9 November 2014, 12:40 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 1,314
|
__________________
|
9 November 2014, 01:28 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 86
|
Niceeeeeeeeeee
|
9 November 2014, 02:51 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: David
Location: NYC & Scottsdale
Watch: The next one...
Posts: 296
|
I bought the stainless diver and had to get rid of it because the bezel was collecting way too many scratches. If your heart is set on ceramic wait until you have enough money to buy that. It will save you money in the long run when compared against buying and flipping the stainless diver.
|
9 November 2014, 03:20 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I prefer the ceramic...but not the price.
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
9 November 2014, 05:41 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 31
|
Thanks Guys. Some really nice pics of divers you have put on here! Just in the airport at Rome after a short vacation there and I am heading home diverless because I still cant make my mind up!
Cheers! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.