What is going on with 32xx Rolex movements

[Daniel23456]

Hey folks,

I wrote about the Explorer 124270 a few years back, then I wrote about the Exp II 226570 as well, but I see it all over and I am really struggling to understand how Rolex does not fix it.

The 32xx is running horribly compared to the 31xx. I have two 31xx that are running so consistently and two 32xx that are consistently annoying.

I am honestly considering moving my 226570 Explorer II for another 5 digit reference at the moment. I honestly find the 5 digits to be way more comfortable and in my case- more reliable. I don’t really understand how people can really tolerate that or maybe it is just the Rolex fans pay more attention to the desirability at the moment more than the quality.

Sorry if it hurts anyone, I am just very frustrated with my 6 digits at the moment.

[WalterE]

Sorry to hear about your obvious pain and frustration.

My 225670 runs about 0.5+ a day consistently at the moment. Worn 24/7, even at night. Cannot complain!

Drop it at the AD for a checkup if it is significantly and consistently out of spec when worn. That's what warranty is for.

[Tbird]

I had my 126200 checked and serviced under warranty this year. Was also running very slow. Now for almost 3 months very consistant, a bit on fast side. Maybe they install better parts now that the movement is a fewyears old. A service can do good!

[crapvegaspodcast]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

Hey folks,

I wrote about the Explorer 124270 a few years back, then I wrote about the Exp II 226570 as well, but I see it all over and I am really struggling to understand how Rolex does not fix it.

The 32xx is running horribly compared to the 31xx. I have two 31xx that are running so consistently and two 32xx that are consistently annoying.

I am honestly considering moving my 226570 Explorer II for another 5 digit reference at the moment. I honestly find the 5 digits to be way more comfortable and in my case- more reliable. I don’t really understand how people can really tolerate that or maybe it is just the Rolex fans pay more attention to the desirability at the moment more than the quality.

Sorry if it hurts anyone, I am just very frustrated with my 6 digits at the moment.

The issue has been fixed. Take your 226570 to RSC to be fixed if it's running slow

[joli160]

Originally Posted by crapvegaspodcast

The issue has been fixed. Take your 226570 to RSC to be fixed if it's running slow

That’s the first time I hear about a fix. Care to share what was the solution to the low amplitude problems with this movement ?

[Gearjockey]

Originally Posted by crapvegaspodcast

The issue has been fixed. Take your 226570 to RSC to be fixed if it's running slow

Please explain how the issue has been fixed.

[Easy E]

Originally Posted by crapvegaspodcast

The issue has been fixed. Take your 226570 to RSC to be fixed if it's running slow

Not trying to be combative, but would you mind sighting your source for this?

[Henrimontgomery]

I agree that I often have to recalibrate my Rolex with that series do caliber. It’s a bit frustrating but then, I remember that my ROC was 10/s day off and I was told it was ok.

[Daniel23456]

I am very much traumatized taking my watch to RSC. They do not look after the watch to the standards that I’d be comfortable with so it is not an option for me as I might end up being more frustrated with scratches I didn’t cause or a hair in the dial or a messed up caseback.

I find it inexcusable having to go to an RSC even under warranty, to fix issues like these.

[crapvegaspodcast]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

I am very much traumatized taking my watch to RSC. They do not look after the watch to the standards that I’d be comfortable with so it is not an option for me as I might end up being more frustrated with scratches I didn’t cause or a hair in the dial or a messed up caseback.

I find it inexcusable having to go to an RSC even under warranty, to fix issues like these.

I don't think mechanical watches are for you.

[Daniel23456]

Originally Posted by crapvegaspodcast

I don't think mechanical watches are for you.

Not true… I am having a blast with my vintage Omegas & Rolexes & Breitling. But when I buy a modern Rolex that claims to keep +-2 seconds per day and receive a -12 result it is very unacceptable. I have a 14060m never serviced that is still keeping consistently +2 seconds per day and jumps to +4 consistently when not worn face up. So I disagree, I enjoy mechanical watches very much.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

Not true… I am having a blast with my vintage Omegas & Rolexes & Breitling. But when I buy a modern Rolex that claims to keep +-2 seconds per day and receive a -12 result it is very unacceptable. I have a 14060m never serviced that is still keeping consistently +2 seconds per day and jumps to +4 consistently when not worn face up. So I disagree, I enjoy mechanical watches very much.

No what they claim watch has been tested in a controlled environment to a precision of -2+2 seconds at time of testing, but on the wrist wearing could vary slightly as on the wrist there are many variables to over come, such as different positions, mainspring power-reserve plus many others out of 86400 seconds in a day.

[Wilco68]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

But when I buy a modern Rolex that claims to keep +-2 seconds per day and receive a -12 result it is very unacceptable.

Spectacular first world problem. Really don’t know how you’re coping…..

[Daniel23456]

Originally Posted by Wilco68

Spectacular first world problem. Really don’t know how you’re coping…..

Everything in this forum is first-world problems then, isn't it.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by Wilco68

Spectacular first world problem. Really don’t know how you’re coping…..

It's not even COSC
And with 86400 seconds in a day and all

[travisb]

I know there's been a lot of complaints with the 32xx movement but I've had zero issues with any of mine since 2018.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by travisb

I know there's been a lot of complaints with the 32xx movement but I've had zero issues with any of mine since 2018.

Same here and many today blown out of all proportion by some members.

[Easy E]

Originally Posted by padi56

Same here and many today blown out of all proportion by some members.

I have owned 7 that had the issue, 2 that have not. Of the 7, two have been sent in for service. How do you think your approach to this situation would differ if you had these results?

[ecbkk]

Originally Posted by Easy E

I have owned 7 that had the issue, 2 that have not. Of the 7, two have been sent in for service. How do you think your approach to this situation would differ if you had these results?

Im surprised that with 9!! 32xx series rolex you arent on some kind of VIP list where rolex makes sure you get the defect free movements instead of one of the 25% of movements with the defect.

[EzraPound]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

I am very much traumatized taking my watch to RSC.

Surely the language used must be hyperbolical.

[BooZiggy]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

I am very much traumatized….

As a therapist who works with people who have experienced actual trauma, I am very much disgusted by your use of this word to describe scratches on a watch.

[Daniel23456]

Originally Posted by BooZiggy

As a therapist who works with people who have experienced actual trauma, I am very much disgusted by your use of this word to describe scratches on a watch.

Wow, dude, chill. I obviously did not mean to “mock” or make fun of people with actual trauma. Being disgusted by it is all yours.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by Daniel23456

Wow, dude, chill. I obviously did not mean to “mock” or make fun of people with actual trauma. Being disgusted by it is all yours.

Ditto

For the record, you don't have to justify anything to anyone. Especially as it's obvious you are using our own words that we can understand quite well what you mean.
Besides, who is some faceless person that's possibly not suitably qualified and sitting down in front of you to judge sufficiently whether you are or aren't actually traumatised to some degree.
For some, the struggle is real.

[Daniel23456]

Originally Posted by Dirt

Ditto

For the record, you don't have to justify anything to anyone. Especially as it's obvious you are using our own words that we can understand quite well what you mean.
Besides, who is some faceless person that's possibly not suitably qualified and sitting down in front of you to judge sufficiently whether you are or aren't actually traumatised to some degree.
For some, the struggle is real.

Cheers mate

[Gearjockey]

Originally Posted by BooZiggy

As a therapist who works with people who have experienced actual trauma, I am very much disgusted by your use of this word to describe scratches on a watch.

That’s a strong first post!

[Jim_K]

Originally Posted by BooZiggy

As a therapist who works with people who have experienced actual trauma, I am very much disgusted by your use of this word to describe scratches on a watch.

oh good lord. Lighten up francis.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by Jim_K

oh good lord. Lighten up francis.

Big BOO has been triggered and on the way to being traumatised.
It's only a matter of time and degrees of mental decline.

[springer]

Originally Posted by BooZiggy

As a therapist who works with people who have experienced actual trauma, I am very much disgusted by your use of this word to describe scratches on a watch.

Your forum troll post is traumatizing me. Chill.

[Dirt]

Originally Posted by springer

Your forum troll post is traumatizing me. Chill.

And a first post as well.

[Krash]

Originally Posted by daniel23456

i am very much traumatized taking my watch to rsc.

Seriously?