The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 November 2005, 07:27 AM   #1
RogerF
"TRF" Member
 
RogerF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Duh!
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: a gonna do?
Posts: 2,573
The 3000 vs 3130 article

Found this in my afternoon travels on the web. I know a few of you guys were asking about this a while back. James Dowling (co-author of Best of Times) describes the differences in this article. Of course all credit goes to him and his associate Mr Hess.

http://www.ukwatches.com/Notes/new_movements.html

New Models & Movements from Rolex

Rolex have introduced a new movement; their third in three years, after the 2235 lady’s movement in 1999 and the 4130 Daytona movement last year. The new movement is called the 3130 and replaces the caliber 3000 in the Air King; it does not immediately replace the 3000 in the Explorer 14270 or the Submariner 14060 but new variants of these two watches will follow in the next few months.

The 30XX series replaced the 15XX series starting in 1977 with the 3035 and the last two models to be replaced were the 1016 Explorer and the 5513 Submariner, the last of which were produced in 1988. The 30XX series were replaced by the 31XX series from 1990 and now (once again) 11 years after the introduction of the series the non-date version is introduced.

Collectors might argue with the choice of the Air King, as the vehicle with which to introduce the new movement but it is difficult to argue with the commercial logic behind the choice. The Air King is a much more vital model to the company than either the 14270 or the 14060, both of which are essentially low production watches whilst the Air King is one of the company’s volume sellers. The new Air King will bear the same model number 14000 but it will now be followed by the letter M (whether it stands for “modified” is something I have been unable to discover). The other Air Kings and the non-date chronometers (14203 & 14208) will also have the letter M appended to their model numbers with the fitting of the new movement.


The 3130 is distinguished from the 3000 by several features; whilst it still beats at 28,000bph it now uses a balance bridge rather than a balance cock and also has a Breguet overcoil hairspring; this means that now all Rolex movements will feature these two company signatures. Also introduced on the 3130 are a new style of reversers for the automatic movement; these are much more efficient than the ones currently used and are an offshoot of the ones introduced 2 years ago on the 2235 lady’s movement. It can safely be assumed that the new reversers will gradually be introduced across the rest of the range, but it is rare that the “base” movement gets technological advances before the more “high end” variants.

The Air King & non-date chronometers will hit the shops within the next few weeks whilst the non date Submariner 14060 will arrive around 4 to 5 weeks later (probably May/June) and the much more revised Explorer a further month later. The new Explorer will bear a new serial number 114270 and will not only have the new movement but also a new bracelet with solid end links which also has a new model number 78690.

The new Air Kings and Submariners represent greater value for money than at present, as they are now chronometer grade movements essentially being sold at a discount. In fact all of the watches with the new movement are now offering more “bang for your buck” as none of the prices have increased at all.

Please note that the delivery times and the price information relate to the UK market only and may not be relevant to your market.
RogerF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 07:32 AM   #2
Goodwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Goodwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Frans ®
Location: Rotterdam
Watch: the sunrise...
Posts: 10,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerF
Found this in my afternoon travels on the web. I know a few of you guys were asking about this a while back. James Dowling (co-author of Best of Times) describes the differences in this article. Of course all credit goes to him and his associate Mr Hess.

http://www.ukwatches.com/Notes/new_movements.html
Wow, and thank you very much. This is in fact what I hoped for, a Sub (without date) with a chronometer movement! Tyler, this is your chance as well!
__________________
Member# 127
Goodwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 07:48 AM   #3
RogerF
"TRF" Member
 
RogerF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Duh!
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: a gonna do?
Posts: 2,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodwatch
Wow, and thank you very much. This is in fact what I hoped for, a Sub (without date) with a chronometer movement! Tyler, this is your chance as well!

Well its nothing new that the 3130 is a chonometer "grade" movement, its just that Rolex doesnt send the movements it puts into the 14060M for certification. To me its just a piece of paper, I have no probs buying a 14060M as it is a great watch with a killer movement. This is an older article and when they refer to the chronometer versions hitting the stores they mean the 114270.

Heres a nice review on the "no date" (hate calling it that) http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...oto=2250&rid=2
RogerF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 08:07 AM   #4
baseballduck
"TRF" Member
 
baseballduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Tyler
Location: Pinehurst NC
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 1,018
Thats awesome! But I'm kinda confused. What happened? LOL

Tyler
__________________
Sedit qui timuit ne non succederet.
Member #84
baseballduck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 08:12 AM   #5
Goodwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Goodwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Frans ®
Location: Rotterdam
Watch: the sunrise...
Posts: 10,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerF
Well its nothing new that the 3130 is a chonometer "grade" movement, its just that Rolex doesnt send the movements it puts into the 14060M for certification. To me its just a piece of paper, I have no probs buying a 14060M as it is a great watch with a killer movement. This is an older article and when they refer to the chronometer versions hitting the stores they mean the 114270.

Heres a nice review on the "no date" (hate calling it that) http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...oto=2250&rid=2
I know that. And I also know that it is just a piece of paper. But that's how it is. Suppose we both went through the same education. And during those years we both had straight A's. Top students. Genius material. But you did your final exams and I didn't. Who's the Doctor then? You! I will be a looser without his diploma.

Besides that, I’m a sucker for these things, I can’t help it. Maybe this is why I like Rolex so much. It is the product of great marketing. And, in my view, an underdog. Yes, an underdog. I guess the other great watch houses (AP, GP, PP, UN) are treating Rolex as ‘new money’. No real pedigree, snobbery. That’s why I like them. They move with the mind boggling pace of a turtle. Never go for fads. Take 20 years or more to change a model. Great! I love it. And the more people tell me Rolex are vulgar, the more I like them.
__________________
Member# 127
Goodwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 08:15 AM   #6
Gedanken
"TRF" Member
 
Gedanken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
Technically true, Frans, but I can tell you firsthand that, unless you're making reservations with an airline or restuarant, the "Doctor" thing's way overrated.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.
Gedanken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 08:34 AM   #7
Goodwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Goodwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Frans ®
Location: Rotterdam
Watch: the sunrise...
Posts: 10,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gedanken
Technically true, Frans, but I can tell you firsthand that, unless you're making reservations with an airline or restuarant, the "Doctor" thing's way overrated.
I know. I have also have a degree. It looks OK on your business card, but that's about it in a country like mine. (Not in Germany. LOL. Herr Doctor und Herr Diplom Ingenieur, me). But I think you know what I was getting at.

Great, this 'slow chat', I really like you guys!
__________________
Member# 127
Goodwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 08:38 AM   #8
Gedanken
"TRF" Member
 
Gedanken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
Hey, we could do the Spies Like Us "doctor doctor" routine!

Hmm, ex-soldier, now doctor, collects Rolexes ...

MY GOD, I'VE FOUND MY LONG-LOST DUTCH TWIN!
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.
Gedanken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 08:49 AM   #9
Goodwatch
"TRF" Member
 
Goodwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Frans ®
Location: Rotterdam
Watch: the sunrise...
Posts: 10,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by baseballduck
Thats awesome! But I'm kinda confused. What happened? LOL

Tyler
I will explain, you only teenager with brains in the Western Hemisphere. Up until now, the Sub (non date) came with a movement that wasn’t COSC certified. But very soon, this will change. The movement of this Sub will become COSC certified and the only difference between the 16610 and this Sub is the date window and the cyclops. But much cheaper. Go for it!
__________________
Member# 127
Goodwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 11:05 AM   #10
maverick
Banned
 
maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodwatch
I will explain, you only teenager with brains in the Western Hemisphere. Up until now, the Sub (non date) came with a movement that wasn’t COSC certified. But very soon, this will change. The movement of this Sub will become COSC certified and the only difference between the 16610 and this Sub is the date window and the cyclops. But much cheaper. Go for it!
Why would Rolex have the ND Sub COSC certified? What reason would they have to change their marketing on this watch? COSC is now just a marketing tool anyway. JMO=) maverick
maverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 11:17 AM   #11
mailman
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,388
Please correct me if I'm wrong but I thought this already happened, hence the "M" in the 14060m?
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 11:35 AM   #12
BruceS
"TRF" Member
 
BruceS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Sir Daft
Location: Cornwall, UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,464
The movement yes, but not the COSC on the Sub. Not sure how old the article is, 'cause the Explorer I and Roger have are COSC certified with the 3130. I reckon Rolex just figured they may as well go to the trouble with the Sub too.
BruceS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 03:51 PM   #13
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
That's an old article, guys.....the ND-Sub has the letter 'M' at the back of the model number which means that the movement has been Modified. No chronometer certificate has yet been attached to it.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2005, 05:44 PM   #14
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick
Why would Rolex have the ND Sub COSC certified? What reason would they have to change their marketing on this watch? is now just a marketing tool anyway. JMO=) maverick
Must agree the COSC is just pure hype,nothing more nothing less.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.