The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 December 2016, 12:15 AM   #1
gmtlove
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 79
Pam 233 vs. 111 in terms of comfort?

Hey guys,

can you please tell me the difference in feel on the wrist between the 233 and 111? I tried the 111 of a co-worker and it was big (17 cm wirst) but not uncomfortable.

I know that these 2 models do have 2 different kind of cases, so my question:
Is the 233 more or less comfortable to wear than the 111?

I would absolutely appreciate comparison pics of the 2 models as i am not able to find comparison pics...


Thanks a lot!
gmtlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2016, 12:42 AM   #2
arnage
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 317
From my recollection (no longer have a 111, but still have the 233), they are both quite comfortable and wear similarly. I think I would give the 111 the comfort edge as it is (presumably) slightly thinner in form, perhaps less top heavy too w a flattened crystal vs domed..

I actually quite miss the 111, and given the right opportunity would buy one again.

My 111 was also DLC coated, which lent to its overall durability - I never really worried about scratching it against anything, and that may have played into my user experience and overall comfort level..
arnage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2016, 05:14 AM   #3
fullcourt
"TRF" Member
 
fullcourt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
the 233 is the 1950 case and will wear a bit higher and have more weight. see if you can get to a boutique or ad to try one on. i have a 328 and love the 1950 case.

hagd
__________________
dp
just living the dream
chicago, usa

chgo_risti on IG
fullcourt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2016, 06:27 AM   #4
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by fullcourt View Post
the 233 is the 1950 case and will wear a bit higher and have more weight. see if you can get to a boutique or ad to try one on. i have a 328 and love the 1950 case.

hagd

233, being a manual wind, is a slightly thinner 1950 case compared to the autos (like the 328), but all 1950 cases are thicker than a 111.

Also, the 233 will appear a tad more bulky than the 111 due to the case shape and dome.

That all being said, it really depends on one's wrist shape and what one likes best.

Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2016, 07:16 AM   #5
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
As long as you get a good fitting strap it won't make a difference.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2016, 07:01 PM   #6
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
I felt the 233 was small but taller. The 111 was thinner but bigger. In reality both are about the same size and comfort.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2016, 08:19 PM   #7
andy66db
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London, England
Posts: 81
Between a 233 and a 390 (pretty much the same case as a 111) I'd say, comfort wise, they're both the same. The 233, although thicker due to the dome crystal, doesn't feel at all top-heavy as long as you don't wear your strap too loose. And compared to a 320, which is much thicker 1950s case to accommodate the auto rotor, both wear very comfortably.
andy66db is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2016, 08:46 PM   #8
gmtlove
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 79
Thanks a lot for your input!
gmtlove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 02:35 AM   #9
Coffes4closers
"TRF" Member
 
Coffes4closers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 326
I have both and prefer the 233. The domed crystal with the case shape just pops! The 111 is a fantastic piece, but just not quite as interesting as the 233. Comfort wise, the 111 feels a bit broader, but lower profile. The 233 hits the sweet spot
Coffes4closers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.