ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

michaelchng2003 · 27 December 2016, 12:01 AM

thank you for your help.

Ragna · 27 December 2016, 01:18 AM

I think this case (like most) merits a close look from a specialist.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

crowncollection · 27 December 2016, 05:07 AM

Need better pics

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

William.L. · 27 December 2016, 07:34 AM

That would be incredibly cool if its real

77T · 27 December 2016, 09:08 AM

The case against this piece is that Rolex did not put coronets on watch dials in the era when they used the old wide crown logo. And the old crown logo did not have the arc spread that yours depicts. Here is a legit logo from mid-1930's

27 December 2016, 05:07 AM	#3
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,157	Need better pics Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

27 December 2016, 07:34 AM	#4
William.L. "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: William Location: Belleville Mi Watch: 1675 & 16013 Posts: 617	That would be incredibly cool if its real __________________ Omega Bumper Automatic Rolex Datejust 16013 TT Rolex GMT 1675/3 Tudor GMT Serti GMT

27 December 2016, 09:08 AM	#5
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,725	The case against this piece is that Rolex did not put coronets on watch dials in the era when they used the old wide crown logo. And the old crown logo did not have the arc spread that yours depicts. Here is a legit logo from mid-1930's __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

27 December 2016, 01:18 AM	#2
Ragna Banned Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: The Matrix Posts: 1,070	I think this case (like most) merits a close look from a specialist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)