ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 January 2017, 07:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Submariner Font Styles
Can anyone tell me if there have been changes to the font style on the Submariner in recent years?
The only reason I ask is this.. I have been looking for a nice used Sub C date on ebay, but whilst looking in close up at some of the dials started to notice distinct differences in the font style & spacing's between certain words that made me start to be suspicious as to whether they were all genuine or not??? The main thing that I noticed was the difference in spacing between the 'ft' the '=' and the '300' text Some examples in no particular order. In first picture below the '=' seems to be equally spaced between the 'ft' and the '300' there is also a space between the '300' and the 'm' Sub Centre =.jpg In the second picture, there is definitely a bigger gap between the '=' and the '300' the 'm' is about the same distance from the '300' as in the first picture. Sub unequall =.jpg In the last picture, the words are all bunched up with no spaces at all. Sub no space =.jpg Are they all correct for their year of manufacture or are any of them suspicious? Many thanks in advance for any info |
17 January 2017, 07:57 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
I got mine in 2013, and after VERY close inspection (just now) my dial is the first one in the list. I've learned from this excellent forum that Rolex changes fonts and dials slightly every now and then, so you will see variations.
|
17 January 2017, 09:17 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: the tide roll in..
Posts: 1,138
|
I believe the first is the current format. The last with no spaces I have seen as well, though can speak to the date range of its use. The middle I don't believe I've seen before, though Rolex is known to change periodically for unknown reasons.
|
17 January 2017, 09:19 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
|
Quite perceptive! Would've never picked that up on my own...
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous |
17 January 2017, 09:24 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Geoff
Location: USA
Watch: ing you!
Posts: 502
|
Well, the Sub has been around since the mid 50s and has seen numerous dial font changes over the years. I am in the camp that when I buy a watch you get what you get. I have never seeked out a watch just for a particular font style on the dial.
|
17 January 2017, 09:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: NC
Watch: RG Olive DD40
Posts: 1,711
|
Previous discussions on this board have shown there's no rhythm or reason to date the font changes. People thought the sans serif was newer but others have had non-random serials with the same font.
Comes down to preference, have had both types and either is fine to me. |
17 January 2017, 09:45 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: SubC, GMT
Posts: 248
|
I've been noticing about the fonts like you. Mine is like the last one. Even the number and the font are different. I bought mine from AD a month ago.
|
17 January 2017, 10:15 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Guy
Location: Toronto
Watch: 116610
Posts: 586
|
Mine is the 2nd one. Great observation!
|
21 January 2017, 04:01 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
I have discovered a 4th variant!
In the example below the text is set out similar to the 'equal space' version but the '=' sign itself is in italic and the 'm' is close up to the '300' whereas before there was a gap. |
21 January 2017, 08:36 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 22
|
I studied this extensively... trawling through threads on many forums of people posting incoming photos or 'sub owners threads' going back years. By total fluke you have posted them in what I found to be date order.
The lastest is the one you just posted, the slightly bolder submariner typography style seems to have emerged only in the very late months of 2016. |
21 January 2017, 01:56 PM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
|
I think pics 1 and 2 are the same, as are 3 and 4. So 2 styles. Although the submariner text in 4 does seem more bold. You're looking at pics taken at different angles and magnifications.
There are multiple threads on this and they are just random as others have stated. |
21 January 2017, 03:53 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
There are at least 4 different dial configurations of the words & characters relating to the following text: (300) (=) (ft) (m) My post wasn't referencing the 'boldness' of the text, it was referencing the different spacing's between the various characters listed above. Regardless of the camera angle, if you look again at the photos and concentrate purely on the spacing's you will see the 4 variations. If you still cant see it, then just for you, I will post some different pictures all taken at the same angle to make it abundantly clear that there are at least 4 (there maybe more) different configurations... Regards. |
|
21 January 2017, 03:58 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
Now you've made me aware of this - I kind of wish you hadn't haha! now this really will keep me awake at night...only kidding, lol |
|
21 January 2017, 04:04 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
|
My 2016 Hulk is the third one. I believe that is the one they are currently using.
|
21 January 2017, 04:10 PM | #15 | |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
|
Quote:
|
|
21 January 2017, 04:12 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
RolexJames confirmed in his reply (#10) that he'd seen this style emerge in late 2016, so would confirm the 2017 advert. |
|
21 January 2017, 04:16 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
|
Right. The one with 1 as an l, the =, and the close m is the one I own. Also happens to be my favourite dial variation of the bunch!
|
21 January 2017, 04:24 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
Actually pics 1&4 are the closest regarding spacing's but the (ft) in pic 4 is a different font altogether - it has a long tail to the 'f' and the (=) in pic 4 is italic not standard as in pic 1. Also, there is no gap between the (300) and (m) in pic 4 whereas there is a clear gap in pic 1 All very subtle I know but definite differences nonetheless... |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.