ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2017, 11:48 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 555
|
|
19 January 2017, 12:21 PM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Michigan
Watch: DD 228238
Posts: 2,456
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex DD 228238 Daytona 116515 (sold) AP 15710 Rolex 116710 BLNR And a few others... |
|
19 January 2017, 12:46 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Posts: 983
|
|
19 January 2017, 01:09 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
it's all relative. Be thankful you don't like vintage Daytonas.
__________________
Instagram: soundsoserious |
19 January 2017, 02:00 PM | #65 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
Quote:
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
|
19 January 2017, 02:35 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: D-Blue, GS SBGE001
Posts: 695
|
|
19 January 2017, 03:26 PM | #67 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Quote:
My next trio will be D blue + 116500 + 116400gv Or Blnr + 116500 + 116400gv + $5000 towards a 4th watch. Leaning towards first option at the moment as there is no 4th watch that I really want. March could possibly change that ? Sent by my pet Gekko
__________________
Follow me on Instagram to see my watch journey @Japenney |
|
19 January 2017, 03:58 PM | #68 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
Quote:
I'm still perfectly happy to wear my original release Deepsea. The new dial looks nice to be sure altho imho not worth the additional 3-4 grand. |
|
19 January 2017, 04:38 PM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
Quote:
I'm not trying to be a smarty pants or anything here, I mean it with the best intentions
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
|
19 January 2017, 04:41 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
The premium between MSRP is only GBP250 or USD300, so I really don't understand where these claims of three to four grand premiums for the D-Blue come from. Even paying MSRP for the D-Blue and scoring a discount on the original doesn't equate to that much of a difference.
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
19 January 2017, 04:56 PM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
When you talk about 'additional cost of thousands..' just to confirm in the UK the difference in list price at an AD between the standard black dial and the JC is £250 GBP or approx. $307 USD at todays exchange rate. I assume you are talking about the grey or second hand market price, which I admit is ridiculously inflated, but isn't relevant to use as a reason not to want one. If you really want one that badly as you state you did when you first saw one, you would get one eventually from an AD and the difference in list price is negligible in the bigger scheme of things. You seem to be confusing 'special edition' with 'limited edition' - when talking about the 'special edition label being thrown around with it' you ask 'can any one confirm that?' Well yes I can confirm that the JC version is indeed a very 'special edition' - limited? no. Limited production/availability, maybe, but not limited to a specific number being produced. There's no 'Hype about it' as you state, just fact. The JC D-blue is a special edition. Special edition & limited edition are 2 very different things. You state that you 'refuse to subscribe to the Hype over a dial'... fair enough, but have you ever asked yourself why there is such 'Hype' over this dial? This is the first watch that Rolex have ever produced with a 2 tone graduated dial and luminous green lettering. That may not be a big deal to you, but in Rolex terms its massive. Also, this is the first watch that Rolex have ever named after a living person, those two facts alone are the main contributors to the 'Hype' you refer to, but to be fair to Rolex, they haven't tried to cash in by over inflating the price - as stated earlier, the difference in list price is negligible, its the natural demand from collectors on the second hand market that has done that. NB. Before anyone replies with 'what about the Paul Newman Daytona?' - that is a watch nicknamed by collectors, NOT Rolex.. just to be clear. |
|
19 January 2017, 06:28 PM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Quote:
|
|
19 January 2017, 06:59 PM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Unseen Thailand
Watch: LN/LV/BLNR
Posts: 543
|
Buy what you like and look nice on your wrist.
For me, I think D-Blue is worth collecting although it costs you a lot of money. It's a stunning watch but for me it is too big. Sad cannot wear this but glad don't lose money. |
19 January 2017, 07:09 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: Omega-Rolex
Posts: 230
|
£15400 few sellers on chrono24 have them for £12000 and the deep blue is £11500 £12000 in uk and I really don't see that watch being worth double the other ss sports rolexs in 10-20 years it only a small portion of Rolex owners who actually like them, so when the hype dies down in a few years time there going south fast IMO
|
19 January 2017, 07:11 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: Omega-Rolex
Posts: 230
|
|
19 January 2017, 09:29 PM | #76 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,192
|
It's all relative to what appeals most to you.
I wouldn't want to "settle" on 2 other SS watches if the one I really wanted equals the cost of those 2. The D-Blue is worth every penny for me. |
19 January 2017, 09:45 PM | #77 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,389
|
Yes definitely worth it and one of the best Rolex IMHO. It is my go to weekend watch and the dial makes this watch very special! Knowing you would keep it only a few weeks or months it is also a great option because it holds it's value really well. So when you go to flip, which you will you, you won't lose much money. For me it is a keeper without a doubt. Also I had the black dial when it first came out and it did little for me - this one far different story. Also for those who say the dial itself isn't worth premium have a look at Rolex history and you will see the dial is everything.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
19 January 2017, 10:00 PM | #78 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
Quote:
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:07 AM | #79 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
Quote:
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:12 AM | #80 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
This is a silly thread anyways because anyone can pick any watch and say "why buy this one when i can buy 2 of those"
ironically the thread was started by someone who probably has owned 20 rolexes in the past 2 years and probably currently owns none with one incoming this week and for sale next week |
20 January 2017, 12:14 AM | #81 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
|
|
20 January 2017, 12:41 AM | #82 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,170
|
Quote:
And that's new from AD. For the black, it's a steel model that with the right relationship that 20% discount can go up. And then the difference becomes even more on secondary market for LNIB or mint pieces where the blue hold value much closer to MSRP and the black drops even further from it's discounted price.. So from what I've seen (and I've owned 3 black and 2 blue over the years), that gap exists, at least in the US. |
|
20 January 2017, 12:51 AM | #83 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,307
|
Quote:
|
|
20 January 2017, 01:09 AM | #84 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
Math never figures into my decisions. If it did, I'd be a mess.
|
20 January 2017, 01:15 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London/Asia
Watch: GMT LN/SD43/D Blue
Posts: 872
|
Paid 8.5K for mine,,,been offered 9,5 k for it.
But will never sell.. So,,,not money wasted - and love the piece |
20 January 2017, 01:21 AM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,354
|
I agree with this...the math doesn't make sense unless you like them equally. You could buy 120 G-Shocks that are probably more accurate....not sure what that has to do with anything.
|
20 January 2017, 01:30 AM | #87 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US East Coast
Watch: Dealer
Posts: 13,482
|
By that logic, 1 Rolex is expensive when you can have x2 Omega's or x2 IWC's etc... buy what you like.
I had a Daytona and flipped it because it was a bit too flashy for my taste. |
20 January 2017, 02:36 AM | #88 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,170
|
|
20 January 2017, 02:40 AM | #89 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,632
|
Quote:
Josh had, and flipped, at least two watches on his current "must have lists" I suspect the Daytona C is only there because he can't actually get one, as much as any real desire to own one. As for the original post itself, the D Blue is less than 3% more expensive than the regular Deepsea. The LV is comparatively more expensive than the regular black sub date as is the BLNR compared to the regular GMT 2. The question should, perhaps, be "is the D Blue worth nearly 50% more than a regular sub?" If Josh is worried that the D Blue is too expensive (as would appear to be the point of his post) then perhaps he should reconsider looking to buy a second one. Alternatvely if Josh is seeking some form of validation for wanting to buy one for a second time, then perhaps a different kind of counseling is in order
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
20 January 2017, 02:45 AM | #90 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,632
|
Quote:
The D Blue is not charged at a premium. The regular Deepsea is sold at a discount (although not in the UK/Europe as far as I can see) There's a big difference.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.