ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 September 2011, 10:48 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Margate
Watch: your back
Posts: 324
|
Deepsea still a bargain compared to Grand Seiko
OK,
I was contemplating on the Deepsea model to replace my seadweller that is no longer as water resistant as it was designed to be - Long story!!. I thought that it was still out of my budget for now but I was blown away when I saw the price of the Seiko 200 m water resistant #SBGA029J1 which is a Grand Seiko in titanium. I can understand that titanium is expensive, but I am sure that I could afford two submariners for the price of what this Seiko goes for. Although Seikos also make good watches, I would never believe to see the day when a new Seiko would cost more than a Rolex unless it was made from platinum and diamonds |
21 September 2011, 10:57 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
There are plenty of GS fans and owners on here. That is an amazing watch. I have a DSSD and I would really suggest you try it on several times before pulling the trigger. If you really liked the SD you might want to try a Sub C.
|
21 September 2011, 12:40 PM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 61,288
|
I just checked "Seiya Japan" site.....US$8125. shipped......that's a lot of semolians
for a 200 m rated dive watch, even if it is a GS (they make magnificent watches) but this one....I'd get a 116610 or a pre-owned DSSD from TRF. p.s. I am not wild about the hands on the GS dive watch.....for an upsacle Seiko dive watch, I'd get the Seiko Marinemaster 300, SBDX001....movement is GS quality....300m rated.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
21 September 2011, 03:58 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
The Grand Seiko is one heck of a watch. The model you are referencing uses spring drive technology which resolves many of the problems inherent with mechanical watches. It fits and finish is at an exceptionally high level.
I understand many will not get past the word "Seiko" and have prejudged what the company has done with their Credor and Grand Seiko lines. How Spring Drive works courtesy of the American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute and Timezone: http://www.timezone.com/library/rdnotebook/200509073623
__________________
|
21 September 2011, 05:02 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
|
The sbdx001 is a great watch, but it seems to have only one crown gasket (correct me if i am wrong), i do not know if it is the same thing with the Grand Seiko: while the first gasket only is under pressure when diving, it is ways good to have a "backup" gasket if the first one is not as waterproof as expected: that is why i took the (slimmer) sub. Any thoughts on this?
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons. |
21 September 2011, 05:45 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 400
|
Quote:
Similar to Rolex, the prices just keep going up and up even though the MSRP from Seiko has remained somewhat constant. Another nice thing is the GS Boutiques in Asia will discount which is where I got mine. As for the watch itself, it gets 99% of my wrist time. It's light, dresses up and down, comfortable, flies under the radar and deadly accurate. It's the best watch I've ever owned and I've owned a few. :-)
__________________
Citizen AQ4020-54X, NB6005-05L, NB6006-02X, Casio GMW-B5000TFC, MRG-B5000B, MTG-B1000XB, Hamilton Field Khaki H70605731, IWC IW356501, IWC387902, Longines Spirit L3.810.4.93.0, MKII PMWF Graywater GMT, Project 300, Omega 210.92.42.20.01.001, 304.33.44.52.03.001, Rolex 116400GV, 116520, 116610LV, 126600, 326933, Seiko SBGA001, SLA019, Sinn U1-ST |
|
21 September 2011, 06:02 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
interesting...
in the looks department the DSSD wins hands down though...
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
21 September 2011, 06:12 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
|
You learn something every day, I sure had no idea that a Seiko could cost so much! Ignorance I guess...
__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun |
21 September 2011, 06:26 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,266
|
Quote:
Now Seiko first entered these competition,with watches from all over the world,including most of the Swiss high end brands.But then for a much higher standard than the now Swiss COSC,the Astronomical Observatory Authorisation Chronometer Standard.Out of many watches summited only two passed this very strict test a Seiko Grand a just off the production line model, and Giraud Peregaux a specially build for the test model.And in the late 1960s there were only two companies, who could sell watches, passed Astronomical Observatory Authorisation Chronometer in those days. ---Seiko and Giraud Peregaux.As the Japanese had dominated in the late 1960s and the two preceding events,it was around 1972 that some Swiss watch manufacturers demanded the end of the observatory competitions. And it was ended in 1973,now thats when the todays Swiss COSC was founded afraid today a COSC tested watch is not the holy grail of watchmaking its just a certification pass at the time of testing. Thats mainly down to most thinking Seiko only produce mass cheap type watches.But watches like the Seiko Grand/ Credor range have been going since the 1960s. But then not heard of in the west then mainly Japan but when the Internet started the Seiko Grand got more recognition world wide .
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
21 September 2011, 07:03 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Paul
Location: UK, Dorset
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,631
|
Grand Seiko is a seperate brand from normal Seiko (Toyota and Lexus is a similar comparison), its only been available in the far east until recently which will explain the lack of exposure in CONUS and Europe. We have a few AD's in London selling GS. There are a lot of posts on TRF debating GS if you wish to find out more.
__________________
Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************** ***************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III |
21 September 2011, 07:11 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Quote:
|
|
21 September 2011, 07:20 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 788
|
Look no further than the Credor Spring Drive Sonnerie, which retails for in excess of $400,000. Pink gold, leather strap and no diamonds.
|
21 September 2011, 07:50 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Yuri
Location: NL
Watch: 14000M, 16570
Posts: 574
|
I just want to say I love Grand Seiko's. From the 56xx, 61xx to the new SBGR001. The SBGR037 is my grail watch!
__________________
(Wearing) First Luxury Watch: Seiko Kinetic Arctura 5M42-0E39 & First Rolex: Air King 14000M Black dial (K) & Second Rolex: Explorer II 16570 White dial (V) (Saving for) Grand Seiko SBGH015J1 |
21 September 2011, 10:32 PM | #14 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,183
|
Quote:
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
|
21 September 2011, 10:43 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Etienne
Location: Malta
Watch: Orient star 300m
Posts: 724
|
I think the MSRP is still less than a SubC and DSSD....
I bought my SubC USED (mint) for 7000USD..so how can you buy 2 Subs with 8000USD worth of NEW Grand Seiko ? The SubC is no slouch in fit and finish but ANY grand Seiko will blow you away..you just have to handle one to appreciate ... |
21 September 2011, 10:43 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
http://www.seikospringdrive.com/sonnerie/
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52 |
|
21 September 2011, 10:49 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,719
|
|
21 September 2011, 10:52 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,719
|
Please excuse the probably stupid question: Do these spring drive movements need a battery (for the electronic brake, quartz module and electronics)?
Edit: http://www.grand-seiko.com/manufactu...gdrive_01.html It uses the energy from the main spring. Question is, if it still needs a rechargeable battery or if it's entirely autonome |
21 September 2011, 11:19 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,150
|
The Yen's exchange rate right now is atrocious and mostly to blame for these prices. I'm a huge GS fan, but the rate is making them unattractive at the moment.
|
21 September 2011, 11:24 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,524
|
The Grand Seiko is one of the nicest and most well made mechanical watch families in the entire industry.
|
21 September 2011, 11:24 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
i am shocked at the price of that GS. its nice, but i cant get my head around the name seiko.
i am sure that the expensive V8 hyundai is a fine car too... |
21 September 2011, 11:31 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: NCR
Watch: Out for that tree!
Posts: 285
|
A comparison to a Hyundai is hardly fair or even close to being accurate.
__________________
"The body will never go where the mind has never been" Rolex SD 126600, Seiko Golden Tuna SBBN 040, PAM 579, JLC Master Compressor Diving Chrono GMT NS in Yellow, DSSD, Sinn U1000S, Doxa T-Graph, Doxa 750 Caribbean, PAM 190 "8-Days", PAM 162,TT DJ (Left to me by Dad) |
22 September 2011, 12:39 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Margate
Watch: your back
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
|
|
22 September 2011, 01:32 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
Quote:
TO THE OP: Have you looked at the GS SBGE001 GMT? It edges-out the GMTIIC in specs (72hr PR, +/-15sec MONTH), is the price of a used GMTIIC, and has 200M WR to boot: http://www.seiyajapan.com/product/S-...GE001-GMT.html I've held my buddies GS SBGE001 and have a MM300 (not GS per say but unreal fit finish like the GS and lume to die for of any watch i've ever owned -- pay close attention to the detail on the indices and hands). While I think it's safe to say we all have a love of Rolex or we wouldn't post here, the top of the line Seiko's will blow your skirt up. |
|
22 September 2011, 01:40 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Margate
Watch: your back
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
I have always admired the Seiko as a value for money timepiece which could take a lot of punishment. I still have a silver wave 36mm diver's Seiko quartz from 1980 which was given to me for my 16th birthday and has proven to be a great chronometer over the years from all the beating and abuse it received from me from playing football, swimming with it, having lost it in the snow at a skiing resort and it even fell in boling water when boiling spaghetti as the spring bar rusted off. It still keeps good time as I have always changed the seals. The quality of stainless steel must also be very good as it has never pitted. I also changed a battery in it just last month as it had a dead battery for some 10 years in it. Still going and telling accurate time . |
|
22 September 2011, 02:23 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
x2222222222222222222222222
Any Grand Seiko time piece is breathtaking. You can spot the quality from a million miles away.
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
22 September 2011, 02:32 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
Watch: Chronomaster
Posts: 107
|
Spring drive is great and all but what is part availability going to be like in 50 years time?
Citizen Chronomaster also worth a look, if you want to appreciate quality engineering.
__________________
Thank you and goodnight - much love! Watches: GMT-IIc, Citizen Chronomaster Friend of The Vintage Watch Specialist |
22 September 2011, 02:44 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Vincent
Location: LON HKG SYD
Posts: 1,236
|
I love Seiko as well and definitely know how good Grand Seiko is but it's so hard to put my mind around it when it comes to cost etc.
It's like the Lexus LFA vs a Ferrari/Lambo. I know my prejudice will still be with the Ferrari or Lambo even though the LFA is an amazing car (can even be argued that it is a better car vs Ferrari 458/Lambo Gallardo etc). |
22 September 2011, 03:06 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
Quote:
Since the SBGE001 was mentioned. Here is a review of mine on TRF's Other Watch Review Section: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...hlight=SBGE001. Spring drive addresses many of the limitations of conventional mechanical movements by replacing the traditional escapement (controls timing function) with a IC controlled electro-mechanical break. That is a significant difference in it is considered by many as the first major leap since John Harrison's initial development of the watch that used an escapement. One beauty shot..... lets make it two; note the sapphire (not ceramic) bezel insert; ooh, la, la check out the lume.
__________________
|
|
22 September 2011, 03:17 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 788
|
I believe it is a limited production model. That said, sonneries are amongst the most complicated and difficult movements to make, so it's not like they are made in large numbers.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.