The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch


ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 11 April 2012, 05:02 AM   #1
submariner ln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Europe
Watch: Ceramic Sub
Posts: 75
Rolex losing time

My rolex is losing 3 seconds a day :( should I take it to be regulated? (It's a one year old ceramic submariner worn 24 hours a day)
submariner ln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:08 AM   #2
shirtguy
"TRF" Member
 
shirtguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ny
Watch: wg datejust, sub-c
Posts: 482
its within the norm if it starts losing more than 5 a day then id bring it in
shirtguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:09 AM   #3
MoBe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,765
It`s running within spec. so don`t worry about it unless it loses more than the current amount.
MoBe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:15 AM   #4
pusscadour
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Madrid
Posts: 34
From what I've read and experienced the watch runs a little slower when the power reserve is full, faster when the reserve is low.
Take it off at night and you should find it runs perfectly. Laying it crown down rather than flat will make it gain even more I think.
pusscadour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:26 AM   #5
pusscadour
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Madrid
Posts: 34
Oops, corrected thanks to a picture borrowed from elsewhere on the internet

pusscadour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:40 AM   #6
azguy
"TRF" Member
 
azguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Watch: Sub 14060M
Posts: 9,653
3 secs is nothing, enjoy the watch
__________________
One on the wrist is worth two in the safe

GMT Master II, Sub 14060M, Omega SMP Chrono Diver, Breitling Evolution, Tudor Sub 79090
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:41 AM   #7
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,806
automatic watches will not be perfect
__________________
Anyone can be cool... but awesome takes practice.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:42 AM   #8
mmmmp
"TRF" Member
 
mmmmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: toronto
Watch: SS Turn-O-Graph
Posts: 588
As mentioned, it's within spec. My 2010 (NIB) Turn-O-Graph has been +4 from day one. Rather than risk dust, dirt, fingerprints by having the watch regulated I chose to ignore it. I've heard too many tales of minor problems occuring when casebacks are removed during service. Don't get me wrong, this likely would never happen but I firmly believe casebacks should only be opened when it's absolutely essential. (full service, mechanical failure, etc.) However, if it bugs you by all means take it in for regulation-it's your watch after all. Good luck and enjoy your Rolex.
mmmmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 05:57 AM   #9
Turpentine
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Maxwell AFB, AL
Posts: 52
Sure!

I do it all the time on new watches if my watch is running slow....takes just a few minutes and at no charge!
Turpentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 06:25 AM   #10
HL65
Moderator & 2014 Bond007 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Connor MacLeod
Location: Glenfinnan
Watch: Yes
Posts: 39,461
That is good news--within COSC specs.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 06:45 AM   #11
moris
"TRF" Member
 
moris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Praha
Watch: Rolex SD 16600-V
Posts: 39
I understand OP being concerned since I myself am also a precission kind of freak. I dont mind +3 secs but Im rather bothered by anything going into minus.. Is it realistic to expect regulating the watch to turn it from -3 into positive numbers?
moris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 06:58 AM   #12
boogiebot
"TRF" Member
 
boogiebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 2,416
like others have said youre within cosc specs so no need for worry.

just curious you never take the watch off your wrist? even when you sleep? how you place the watch, whether it be on the side, face up or face down can sometimes have an effect to gain or lose seconds.
boogiebot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 07:28 AM   #13
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 4,637
It's fine. That's within specs. It's not a quartz watch. It's not going to keep perfect time. Enjoy it. I've never heard of any mechanical watch that doesn't lose or gain some time over a few days. 3 sec a day is nothing.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 08:08 AM   #14
mjclark32
2014 Bond007 Pledge Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Clark
Location: Radnor, PA, USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 17,114
-3 is just fine. Enjoy that piece
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 11:30 AM   #15
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,147
Relax! It's a mechanical watch. -3 secs/day is still amazing!

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 12:49 PM   #16
dddrees
2014 Bond007 Pledge Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 28,103
You really didn't state how you are actually came to this conclusion that it is -3 a day.

So the best way to test is to make sure you first give your watch 40 winds to top off the power reserve and wear the watch anywhere from 8 to 10 hours a day. Although your Rolex is a self wind watch, typically most people will not do enough activity to actually top off the power reserve, so giving the watch a full 40 winds every other week typically is best. The watch will run more efficiently when the power reserve is topped off.

Set the watch to an accurate time source and then check the watch after 7 days. Since position, tempature, and other things can account for accuracy, it is best to check after at least 7 days of running the watch and average your result.

However if it is -3 seconds a day this is hardly anything to worry about as it is still well within COSC. COSC is after all between -4 and +6. After 30 days your still only 90 seconds off, which is pretty amazing considering this is a mechanical and not a quartz watch.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 04:57 PM   #17
padi56
Moderator & 2014 Bond007 Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 35,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by submariner ln View Post
My rolex is losing 3 seconds a day :( should I take it to be regulated? (It's a one year old ceramic submariner worn 24 hours a day)
Your watch is fine remember there are 86400 seconds in a day and your watch is now showing 99.997% accuracy try resting while of wrist flat dial up over night.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.com

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 06:36 PM   #18
travisb
2014 Bond007 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 10,586
3 seconds is fine..

I wouldn't do a thing.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 09:07 PM   #19
directioneng
2014 Bond007 Pledge Member
 
directioneng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: GMT TTc
Posts: 19,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceCoolDaytona View Post
perfectly normal its 99.9999 accurate
Peter's 99.997 is closer to '99.996528' than to your 99.9999.
__________________
directioneng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2012, 09:28 PM   #20
submariner ln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Europe
Watch: Ceramic Sub
Posts: 75
Ok thanks for all the help guys, I'm gonna star leaving it face up at night instead of on my wrist :)
submariner ln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2012, 08:23 AM   #21
Horologer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Watch: Sub 5513
Posts: 34
I tested my 5513 sub in various positions last year.
Here are the results:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=177498
This may not work for newer watches.
Horologer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Banner Of The Month
*Banner Of The Month*
This space is provided free of charge to outstanding horological resources.







Copyright 2004-2013, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.