ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Vanessa · 18 July 2008, 02:29 PM

Hi guys

On an earlier thread the water resistance rating on GMT versus Submariner came to question, so I did some research on my own on the differences in the tickness of the case back.
I will have to add to this list as the watches come into my shop for repair, but this is what I got so far from the watches I'm currently working on. Please keep in mind, the mm gauge I'm using is old, and might not be accurate up to 0.02mm.

GMT Master 16750 - 0.72mm
Submariner 16610 - 1.51mm (more than twice the tickness of the old GMT)
Lady's DJ (older) 69174 - 0.50mm
Lady's DJ (newer) 79174 - 0.49mm
Gent's DJ (older) 16013 - 0.75mm
Gent's DJ (newer) 16233 - 0.81mm

sbakar · 18 July 2008, 02:38 PM

Any info on the SD 4000???

Thanks.

SNB

Vanessa · 18 July 2008, 02:43 PM

Nope, this info isn't posted anywhere by my knowledge. The numbers I posted are the ones I measured today on watches that I have in for repair. I doubt I'll see the DSSD anytime soon for repair!

sbakar · 18 July 2008, 02:45 PM

Thanks for the info...by 'SD 4000' I meant the CLASSIC SD...not the DSSD.

These darn SD's just keep on ticking!

SNB

DSJ · 18 July 2008, 02:46 PM

Great info! As we discussed, it will be interesting so see what a 116710 or the like has for thickness in contrast.

Vanessa · 18 July 2008, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbakar

Thanks for the info...by 'SD 4000' I meant the CLASSIC SD...not the DSSD.

These darn SD's just keep on ticking!

SNB

Oops, sorry! All these numbers got me confused! You're right, but I won't ever have a SD in repair, because those go to the factory anyways. I do not have the equipment to test to 4000ft so I cannot get parts for it...

mickeydainish · 18 July 2008, 03:28 PM

Hiya Vanessa... Tx for the info... :-)

jasonbellevue · 18 July 2008, 05:13 PM

Very useful information, Vanessa, especially the bit about not being able to test the SD.

JJ Irani · 18 July 2008, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Hi guys

On an earlier thread the water resistance rating on GMT versus Submariner came to question, so I did some research on my own on the differences in the tickness of the case back.
I will have to add to this list as the watches come into my shop for repair, but this is what I got so far from the watches I'm currently working on. Please keep in mind, the mm gauge I'm using is old, and might not be accurate up to 0.02mm.

GMT Master 16750 - 0.72mm
Submariner 16610 - 1.51mm (more than twice the tickness of the old GMT)
Lady's DJ (older) 69174 - 0.50mm
Lady's DJ (newer) 79174 - 0.49mm
Gent's DJ (older) 16013 - 0.75mm
Gent's DJ (newer) 16233 - 0.81mm

Great info, Vanessa.

The Sub caseback thickness of 1.51 mm is impressive. By the same token, can we assume that the caseback thickness of the YM (40 mm) would be the same as the Sub?

Thanks - JJ

Z-Sub · 18 July 2008, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Great info, Vanessa.

The Sub caseback thickness of 1.51 mm is impressive. By the same token, can we assume that the caseback thickness of the YM (40 mm) would be the same as the Sub?

Thanks - JJ

isn't YM's WR rating 100m as well? I checked the thickness using naked eye between my Sub and my GMT, there is visible difference. Also, I compare it with a Daytona from a friend, Sub's caseback was also thicker than daytona visibly.

acce1999 · 18 July 2008, 08:11 PM

Great info! Thanks. Please continue to update your list. I am one of the curious!

Best,

A

swatty · 18 July 2008, 08:16 PM

Thanks Vanessa,

So GMT iic case back ?

Sorry for being a pain

walds11 · 18 July 2008, 08:33 PM

Vanessa, thanks for the info.

How about the 14060M? Same as the 16610? Somewhere I saw that the case thickness of the 14060M is .2mm thinner than the 16610.

pwrslider · 18 July 2008, 10:46 PM

Great info ..........thanks!

18 July 2008, 02:29 PM	#1
Vanessa TechXpert & 2009 Patron Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: AZ Posts: 441	Case back thickness Hi guys On an earlier thread the water resistance rating on GMT versus Submariner came to question, so I did some research on my own on the differences in the tickness of the case back. I will have to add to this list as the watches come into my shop for repair, but this is what I got so far from the watches I'm currently working on. Please keep in mind, the mm gauge I'm using is old, and might not be accurate up to 0.02mm. GMT Master 16750 - 0.72mm Submariner 16610 - 1.51mm (more than twice the tickness of the old GMT) Lady's DJ (older) 69174 - 0.50mm Lady's DJ (newer) 79174 - 0.49mm Gent's DJ (older) 16013 - 0.75mm Gent's DJ (newer) 16233 - 0.81mm __________________

18 July 2008, 02:43 PM	#3
Vanessa TechXpert & 2009 Patron Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: AZ Posts: 441	Nope, this info isn't posted anywhere by my knowledge. The numbers I posted are the ones I measured today on watches that I have in for repair. I doubt I'll see the DSSD anytime soon for repair! __________________

18 July 2008, 02:46 PM	#5
DSJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: David Location: Calif & Minn - US Watch: Bluesy Expy2 SMP Posts: 7,685	Great info! As we discussed, it will be interesting so see what a 116710 or the like has for thickness in contrast. __________________ Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16613 Cobalt "Bluesy" 16570 Expy2 Noir 2552.80 SMP

18 July 2008, 03:28 PM	#7
mickeydainish "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Michael Location: Australia Watch: Sub Date 16610 Posts: 1,714	Hiya Vanessa... Tx for the info... :-) __________________ :-) "Be the change you would like to see in the world." - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.

18 July 2008, 05:13 PM	#8
jasonbellevue "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Jason Location: at home Posts: 5,125	Very useful information, Vanessa, especially the bit about not being able to test the SD. __________________

18 July 2008, 02:38 PM	#2
sbakar "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North Vancouver Posts: 651	Any info on the SD 4000??? Thanks. SNB

18 July 2008, 02:45 PM	#4
sbakar "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North Vancouver Posts: 651	Thanks for the info...by 'SD 4000' I meant the CLASSIC SD...not the DSSD. These darn SD's just keep on ticking! SNB

18 July 2008, 08:11 PM	#11
acce1999 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Anders Location: GMT+1 Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,537	Great info! Thanks. Please continue to update your list. I am one of the curious! Best, A

18 July 2008, 08:16 PM	#12
swatty 2010 Pledge 250 Ink Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: 116710,16613, 1601 Posts: 7,869	Thanks Vanessa, So GMT iic case back ? Sorry for being a pain

18 July 2008, 08:33 PM	#13
walds11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Philly, PA Posts: 2,974	Vanessa, thanks for the info. How about the 14060M? Same as the 16610? Somewhere I saw that the case thickness of the 14060M is .2mm thinner than the 16610. __________________ Adam

18 July 2008, 10:46 PM	#14
pwrslider 2010 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Steve Location: SF BAY AREA CA Watch: 16710 Coke Posts: 3,047	Great info ..........thanks! __________________ Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95) Rolex SS GMT IIc (08) Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..) Rolex Explorer II Blk (91) Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07) Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Rolex Forums generated this page in 0.158 seconds (62.27% PHP - 37.73% MySQL) with 9 queries
Contact Us - The Rolex Forums - Archive - Top

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX