Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T
No, you were not plagiarizing. Just standing on the shoulders of the many researchers ahead of you. Nothing wrong in that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
|
Indeed. A fact I am very clear to state. However, asserting whole passages are 'lifted' goes beyond that.
Thank you for the explicit retraction. You can also see there is a fair bit of original research there. However, we all stand on the shoulders of giants.
So, cutting through the rhetorical flourishes, is the exchange between Smiths and Rolex satisfactory? Smiths are clear and explicit that there was no Rolex on the summit. Rolex do not dispute that, even if they focus on Hillary.