View Single Post
Old 12 October 2021, 06:10 PM   #7
agent_orange
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by asiparks View Post
Well, that's not cool.
Was this seller the original receiver of the watch from Rolex ?

Anything past that first, original transaction, the watch can be "Like new" or "As New", but not "New"...
"Like New" is a subjective evaluation that can differ between buyer and seller.
He may make the argument that if was not the original receiver of the watch from Rolex, you should have expected it to be not "New" in the legal sense, and he can therefore charge you the restocking fee.

good luck !
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback and support!
The card is dated to 2019 and doesn't have a name. It's originating from an AD in Portugal. During our conversation prior to the deal when I inquired about the origin of the watch - he said: "I don't buy from the general public - only on trade shows from ADs".

I guess he can argue a lot of things. But I asked him MANY times if the watch had ANY wear marks prior to sending him the money - and he reassured me that it doesn't. And also - the interpretation of "what NEW means" it's clearly explained on his own website as well as on Chrono24 of course. So legally, as far as NYC law is concerned - he cemented himself from all directions.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg new_1.jpg (55.9 KB, 1260 views)
File Type: jpg new_2.jpg (89.0 KB, 1254 views)
File Type: jpg Policy.jpg (133.6 KB, 1305 views)
agent_orange is offline   Reply With Quote