View Single Post
Old 4 January 2022, 12:48 PM   #85
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onequik135i View Post
Are these newer 321 movements rated at COSC?
There is no official certificate issued with the Caliber 321s. As for accuracy, I can only speak about my own, which averages +7 in all positions except for Crown-Down which runs at -8. Not within COSC iirc, but it works out in the end as when it's ahead more than 30s I simply store it overnight in the CD position.

As I noted in my OP, if you want improved accuracy, a 3861-equipped reference is the way to go. That the 321 is reasonably accurate is more than I expected.

On a side note, I was amazed to find out that running the chronograph (complication) has little impact on the accuracy or amplitude. My (new) El Primero 400 is much more impacted, running 2~3s slower (than without the chronograph running) and taking a pretty strong hit in amplitude.

__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote