Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77
1) Is this last zero too "loose?" It's not only lower and apart from the rest of the reference number, but it's squiggly. I couldn't find another example online that was quite this "off."
2) The watch also had a recent RSC service, although the warranty card states "16800" not "168000," which I've read is fairly common for Rolex paperwork on legit 168000s.
3) Still, does that last zero look so odd as to raise any eyebrows that it might not be legit? Any opinions and insight most appreciated.
|
I put some numbers on selected questions.
1) yes it’s way too primitive.
2) no the RSC had the correct ref#.
3) it’s handicraft at work - not legit IMHO.
But even if you do buy it, good luck convincing the next buyer that it is legit. Again just my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro