Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones
Can you explain what you don’t like about the clasp? Is it the lack of micro-adjustment? Even though the Nautilus and Royal Oak don’t have that? Even though that makes for a more elegant and smaller clasp compared to the huge Rolex clasps?
What kind of “thought” has gone into the Oyster bracelet? Its design hasn’t changed for decades. Other than adding PCLs, which isn’t exactly a lot of effort?
|
Agreed on the clasp, I like that it’s smaller and more elegant. It’s a nice clasp indeed. I do like having micro adjustment but I can live without it.
The biggest issue with the bracelet is the lack of taper. It makes the width of the clasp too large, and a chunky bracelet is the opposite of elegant. It would wear so much nicer if they tapered it more. Start at 20mm and go down to 16mm. It’s a winning formula.