Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrimontgomery
I have to disagree. Tudor has proportions, typefaces, hands, a logo, and finishing that are, to me, unpleasant.
Sometime you like something and sometime you don’t.
Do I wish I preferred Tudor over Rolex ? Yes. It would be economical. But I just don’t.
|
I agree with you when it comes to proportions, especially the thickness on the GMT. But on other models, proportions are good.
I like their watches, they have beautiful vintage feel and they offer good value for money.
So I bought one and I sold it quite fast. Loved the dial and the size but It was too thick and uncomfortable to wear (BB pro GMT)........because when you have a Rolex in your collection you automatically want to wear the more comfortable watch.
I think Tudor is a perfect starting point for the person that did not buy a Rolex yet......or if you want a cheaper version of Rolex to wear and tear for your outdoor activities, harsher conditions.