Quote:
Originally Posted by Roddypeepa
Because I don’t think I am wrong. And clearly neither do you. So we will have to agree to disagree. That’s fine.
Cheers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
You're expressing a view as fact, with no basis for doing so other than you don't think you're wrong.
Might want to think twice before giving advice on that basis. Or at least make it clear that the advice given is based on your understanding.
I'm 100% open to being shown thw "small print" as it were. It was my understanding also that the +/- 2spd was an average result.
But its not what Rolex state. And there's no small print.
Rolex do call their superlative testing procedures "draconian" and state:
Today, every Rolex movement is certified by the Swiss Official Chronometer
Testing Institute (COSC) before it is cased. In order to be declared a ‘Superlative Chronometer’, the finished and assembled watch must then pass the Superlative Control tests. This certification, unique to the Rolex Manufacture, guarantees an exceptional precision of –2/+2 seconds per day
https://newsroom-content.rolex.com/-...hmaking_en.pdf
If they meant +/- 2 spd on average it would have been mentioned there, don't you think?
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...
), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR
Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.