Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum - View Single Post

johnswatch · 6 November 2009, 01:07 AM

The 312 is a fantastic looking piece.

Unfortunately the one I saw had a slightly mis-cut date window and the date didn't seem to line up consistently. A tiny blemish and one very easily fixed but would have driven me crazy and required a trip to a service centre for warranty work.

It could well be the reason that AD had one oin stock when the other had a massive waiting list.

Regardless, I'm very happy and satisfied with my 112.

6 November 2009, 01:07 AM	#43
johnswatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: in a dream world Posts: 488	The 312 is a fantastic looking piece. Unfortunately the one I saw had a slightly mis-cut date window and the date didn't seem to line up consistently. A tiny blemish and one very easily fixed but would have driven me crazy and required a trip to a service centre for warranty work. It could well be the reason that AD had one oin stock when the other had a massive waiting list. Regardless, I'm very happy and satisfied with my 112. __________________ 18k GMTIIc, II,16013 DJ, PAM 112, Patek ref 96J, Helson Bronze, Elgin Trench, Gruen Curvex, Omega F300 and a few others......