View Single Post
Old 13 June 2011, 08:47 PM   #18
Patrick Lim
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore :)
Watch: Sea Dweller 4000
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post

Bracelet and Clasp
Standard issue pre-ceramic flip lock here with the SELs. I like it very much for its lightness and beauty, but really wish they had put one more removable link on the 6:00 side. My wrist is small and 5 links on this side is almost too much. I know many people have removed a perm link, but this is invasive and I'm not quite ready to do it. The clasp is really not centered at all and the head leans towards the 12:00 side, but in all honesty, it is not much different than what I've experienced with the 93150 bracelets. I can live with it. In a perfect world, I'd have a Sub-C glidelock clasp on this watch and all would be well with the world.
[/IMG]
Excellent review!

I faced similar issue with the SD which I have just acquired.
Decided to leave the watch as it is even though the clasp is not centred.
Small sacriface to pay for a timeless classic!

And as you have pointed out, removal of the cyclop makes a (small) world of difference on the wrist!
__________________
There is never enough time for good watches
Patrick Lim is offline   Reply With Quote