View Single Post
Old 25 April 2012, 10:04 AM   #13
NYMike
"TRF" Member
 
NYMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: NYC
Watch: 16610,1675, 116518
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by transio View Post
Oh boy... Angry much? I didn't invent the terms "highly" or "stylized". Certainly the etymology of "vintage" is from wine. Vint = vin = wine. However, in terms of use of the term to qualify other goods, I am correct that it began with clothing. As for your wiki quote, well it only supports my statement How do you suppose one would recognize clothing from a different era if it's not "highly stylized?". Items devoid of style are impossible to classify. Further, pre-20th century clothing qualifies as antique, so it's no longer vintage. Finally, with regards to price, I was speaking relative to new and antique prices. Cheers.
So MC Hammer Pants would be Vintage because they are highly stylized, but a pair of simple James Dean styled Jeans would not be?
NYMike is offline   Reply With Quote