Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum - View Single Post - Have you had problems with Steve Mullholland?

michel33 · 25 May 2012, 01:24 PM

This watch was sold for the price of an original matt dial 5513, this is a first indication of how to construe the seller's ad.
When the buyer sent him an e.mail about the dial being original to the watch or not, the seller asserts it is an original matt dial 5513, right? He does not argue that his ad did not mention the word "original", that the buyer should have done his "homework" or whatever BS, right?
So what exact word is written or not in his ad is no more relevant, as this is a binding assertion that clearly gives us the correct interpretation of the seller's ad.
By asserting the watch has an original matt dial, the seller commits himself to refund the buyer if it is not true. Period.

25 May 2012, 01:24 PM	#59
michel33 Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: france Posts: 796	This watch was sold for the price of an original matt dial 5513, this is a first indication of how to construe the seller's ad. When the buyer sent him an e.mail about the dial being original to the watch or not, the seller asserts it is an original matt dial 5513, right? He does not argue that his ad did not mention the word "original", that the buyer should have done his "homework" or whatever BS, right? So what exact word is written or not in his ad is no more relevant, as this is a binding assertion that clearly gives us the correct interpretation of the seller's ad. By asserting the watch has an original matt dial, the seller commits himself to refund the buyer if it is not true. Period.