View Single Post
Old 16 June 2012, 06:50 PM   #39
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by htc8p View Post
i think rolex will have the advantage here. everybody is rushing to make their own movements now that they cannot get it from ETA. Rolex has already established their own workhorse movements. so their investments before are still paying off now. they have no reason to retire their movements or further improve it.

yet another plus for rolex.
Well Omega didn't exactly rush, they took 10 years to develop the Cal 8500, point is, the 3135 does have problems, and does have inferior specifications to nearly every new movement coming onto the market. If they want to be known 10 years as that maker that charges premium prices for 30 year old movements with dodgy winding mechanisms, that's a pretty good way to go about it.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote