View Single Post
Old 7 August 2012, 03:02 AM   #23
ReXTless
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Up North
Posts: 53
Great review. Thanks for putting it together.

I have both watches as well and also prefer the 8500 by a wide margin, and largely for the same reasons you articulated.

Here's where my impressions differ from yours:

1. I prefer the green lume on the 2500. I find it to be much brighter and it lasts longer. The green/yellow tint in daylight doesn't bother me at all. The blue lume is bright enough to read in the dark, but it loses the "pop" that green offers.

2. The 8500 dial is great, EXCEPT for the date window. It's not beveled and looks like a big hole in the dial, as compared to the 2500. This is the biggest issue I have with the watch. It drives me nuts. Note: this is only on the 42mm version. The 45.5 has a beveled window, as it has more dial space to work with.

3. The clasp on the 8500 is too short. The bracelet barely opens enough to slide the watch over my hand. A longer clasp, like the 2500, avoids this problem.

- Mark
ReXTless is offline