View Single Post
Old 11 December 2012, 09:20 AM   #13
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGESQ View Post
Tried it on at a boutique in Boca.


It's is sooooooo light, it does not feel real.


Looks fine, but it was far too light for me to take seriously--so to speak.
It weighs 146 grams, the Rolex Sub-C in stainless weighs 151 grams and the outgoing Submariner 16610 weighs 135 grams.

It feels real light compared to the stainless version at over 200 grams, but at 146 grams, its about equal to a Sub-C and more than almost every other stainless Rolex in the range.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote